Untitled Article

the judges the jury's awareness. because it's very prejudicial and is not really probative of anything that they're asked to be problem-solving or consider who are you referring to? there doctor filled i don't want to get too deep into the law here, but it is not uncommon at all for people who are accomplices to crimes, people who have taken plea deals, non-prosecution that is not uncommon at all for for those people to then testify in subsequent trials for their alleged coconspirators. that's kind of how a lot of these prosecutions work well really give me examples of where that has been considered appropriate i mean, it looks prosecutors are prosecuting organized crime all the time and in a lot of those cases, they are relying on coconspirators to put people who are at the higher levels of the organization behind bars. i just i don't understand how you can say that because