Untitled Article

i can overcome. >> that's what i was going to say in the dna is just so definitive here. >> he's still maintaining his innocence. >> of course, how is this though in court well, the dna came from a minimum of one hair and of course his attorneys are saying one hair, one hair is not reasonable, but whether the hair is his or belongs to his wife, it shows transference and the dna you can try i do attack in court, but when you have dna plus a manifesto again, with details that show he learned from his mistakes and dates the killings back to 2000. >> i think that these two things combined are going to be very difficult for the defense to overcome. and it makes me wonder, especially since humans wife was not in court today and she's been supportive in the past, but maybe her absence today's speaks volumes it wouldn't surprise me if you're a man does begin to think perhaps a plea bargain is in his best interest. >> her absence as well during