They could Immigration Reform and also use that to their political advantage. And as youve already heard, when the democrats had both the white house and the majority in the senate and the house we still are advocating for the reform and we were happy for the relief of the dreamers, we were happy because it wasnt what we wanted, we wanted the dream act so we applauded the administrative resolution, not a solution but a bandaid that provided relief for thousands. We supported the latest administrative action of president obama to provide to the parents of those who have children and are u. S. Citizens or residents. That was going to perhaps help out maybe 5 million of the 11 or so million undocumented in the country today. The president announced it and doing so, he angered the republicans and of course they initiated some action in the house to derail it in one way or another before they had a chance to do that some judge in texas ruled it unconstitutional and if its on hold until this
I do catch instances where i wish we were more transparent and better about customer service. The other thing id like to mention. We had a group get together in little rock to discuss reimbursement to providers that have provided outside care. Youll have situations that arise, now with this 40mile rule that the v. A. Owes this money, it appears the v. A. Owes a lot of people in arkansas a lot of money. And has not been very forthcoming in paying those bills. Its another thing that makes it such that the trust issue that we talk about. The other problem is, if you dont pay your bills theyre going to quit dealing with you. And then, thats the greatest thing. And that really is going to affect quality of care. Can you quickly mention that . I will, and maybe ill ask carolyn to comment. I talked about the five strategies from my v. A. One of them i talked about was improving our internal support services. And going to assured Services Model where we centralize the bill paying. So thats all
And now to london for Prime Ministers question time live from the british house of commons. Every wednesday while parliament is in session Prime Minister David Cameron takes questions from members of the house of commons. Prior to question time the house is wrapping up other business. This is live coverage on cspa cspan2. A reminder of the sacrifices that Police Officers make on our behalf every day of every year. Oon a happy note im sure the house will wish to congratulate professor higgs who is sharing this years nobel prize for physics. It is a richly deserved recognition of his research and attribute the uks world leading universities where his research was carried out. Mr. Speaker, this morning i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in this house, i shall have further such meetings later today. Tom maheras. Can i associate myself and my constituents entirely with attribute the primers has made to the victims of terrorism in nairobi and
Bloomberg knows better than that. Thatheard some people say we stop crime. I can go door to door and stick it in. We cannot do that. I wish you would emphasize that we cannot allow Police Officers to do that because the constitution says you cannot. I appreciate the point. That is one more point from the judges ruling. Judges ruling. It may lower the crime rate but it is unconstitutional. That is not where we begin, that is where we end. Situation, you can lock down an entire city. In that particular situation, that made sense will stop sense. Legal and moral problems. We cannot look at these issues through the narrow problem prism of what could reduce crime. We have to look at Public Safety and the fact that we are a democracy with open values and tolerance. Some sense of equal treatment. Even people who disagree with me and think that this is a toward that should be used sometimes and disagrees with the court, i should mention, we have to look see our eyes wide open to how these prog
Incompetence release them early without any kind of records. There was a big for of a better word freak out in the american media. These guys are deftly coming here and coming to the United States. Theyre going to wreak havoc and as a result Border Patrol and these people were eventually apprehended or they faded away and Nothing Happened but the point is because American Immigration enforcement because our immigration laws are so focused on keeping people out for economic reasons or for any other types of reasons a small amount of what they are pulled to do focus on legitimate threats. Instead they are more concerned with asking how will an additional worker affect the wages for american tomato pickers . Theyre more concerned with how one additional worker will affect the labor Market Conditions or computer programmers in silicon valley. They are more concerned with where a highskilled immigrants will take a Conference Call with her is at his home or whether that home is listed as a p