such as the affair. she told me that her dad who gave her advice was in the very first london marathon 43 years ago. sol the very first london marathon 43 years ago. so i spoke to her and she said that a lot of things have changed. a lot of things have changed. a lot of things have changed. anotherfantastic changed. a lot of things have changed. another fantastic comedian duo who were running who last year did it in some three hours, this time he was pushing rosiejones the whole distance. i asked rosie what it meant to her that this year the elite women and wheelchair participants would be getting equal prize money. it participants would be getting equal prize money-— prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we _ prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we decided _ prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we decided to _ prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we decided to do - prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we decided to do it, - prize money. it was very nice. as soon as we decided to do it, all. prize money. it was very nice. as l soon as we decided to do it, all the suppori— soon as we decided to do it, all the support we — soon as we decided to do it, all the support we needed we got. yes, now it's support we needed we got. yes, now ii's when_ support we needed we got. yes, now it's when can — support we needed we got. yes, now it's when can we do it again? i�*ve it's when can we do it again? i've not to it's when can we do it again? i've got to us- _ it's when can we do it again? i've got to us- you — it's when can we do it again? i�*e: got to us. you obviously enjoyed it
tomorrow. what's that going to look like? what's that going to sound like? you won't be able to see it and you won't be able to hear it because there's no cameras in the courtroom but we have a team of reporters that will be there chronicling every little development. and we're expecting prosecutors to start telling the story. they have a ton of witnesses lined up ready to go to explain to the jury what happened back in 2016 and why in their opinion, it's a crime the prosecution is expected to call folks like michael cohen, as i mentioned, the longtime attorney to donald trump, who has turned against him and is in many ways the star witness in this case stormy daniels, who alleged the affair and got the hush money payment to $130,000. there's also hope hicks, trump campaign official back in 2016, who was part of that behind the scenes scramble to try to make sure that there weren't negative stories like these coming out in the press. there's also karen mcdougal. you see there on the bottom left she is another woman who alleged in a
that jury it was not to integrate the electoral process it was in fact to disguise and hide the fact he had this extra marital affair when he was married to melania trump it's a complicated issue, complicated process and complicated with the fact very high profile defendant in the midst of it. >> to your knowledge has there been any evidence it would make it some tomorrow from the opening statements of the prosecution. has there's been any evidence the former president did have that intent to make these alleged payments to interfere with the election as opposed to what you just said what he has been saying he had in accountant do it he thought they were legal expenses. >> it's he said, he said. it's going to boil down to a former president trump takes the stand it's going to see whether or not the jury believes him. and michael cohen presumably is going to testify on behalf of the prosecution and explain the underlying reasons why he was
narrator: sherry's story wasn't much different than tim's. she said that timmy was a very dear friend of hers, that they spent time together, but they strictly had a friendship, and that was it. narrator: now detectives confronted sherry with the evidence from her cellphone. this interview ended, but it apparently had quite an effect on sherry engel. later that day, she came back to the police station and told detectives it was time to come clean. detective: okay. okay. a rattled sherry now confessed to the affair with tim rogers.
federal campaign finance laws. so are you saying that even if that's true? he shouldn't have been charged and that he's above the law what i'm saying is that these prosecutors are using someone as who's testimony has been proven to be a liar. >> michael cole has lied before congress multiple times. that's their main witness. i would say that he certainly is not someone who can be trusted to do the right thing. during this jury trial, they're also using a woman's testimony who signed a letter saying that this affair did not happen, that she has testified in the past that this never occurred. and so now they're going forward with the case built on that and saying that because donald trump paid his legal bills, that now he can be prosecuted for something that even the person that alleged it happened is saying did not happen. so that's what is so shocking to me. i guess dana is that when i'm walking around this state and talking to people, talking to people across the country. they don't even know which trial this is. they're like, i don't remember which one this wasn't about is this the one they're coming
whittling down that jury pool to get a seated panel of 12 and six it's alternates. this is expected to go about six weeks, perhaps that means we could have a verdict this summer. and of course, donald trump has pleaded not guilty and he denies the affair with stormy daniels very aggressively one of. the prosecutor is going to be talking about tomorrow. unfortunately, the viewers at home, you won't be able to watch. you won't even be able to listen. there are no cameras in court. we have an entire team of reporters that will be there and sketch artists to do their best to bring it to life the prosecutors are going to try to bring this to life by telling a story of what happened in 2016. and they have a bunch of witnesses lined up and ready to go that surely there'll be presenting in the coming days and weeks. michael cohen, first and foremost he's the star witness in many respects. he was trump's right-hand man, attorney and fixer. he has now turned state's witness and he has a serious critic of donald trump.
judge tanya chutkan where he is running for president alongside the other insurrectionist, he is not running on his alleged affair with stormy daniels or care of dougal, he is not running on the checks he wrote from the oval office. he is not running on the facts because these are not facts that he wants out there. >> and even worse than that, all he is looking to do is to create symbols for more people to buy in the narrative he has created. this narrative that justice is against him, most most of his supporters believe there is some republicans who don't believe it but maybe would believe it if they saw donald trump, for instance, in handcuffs because they would say, well that is just too far. i do think he wants to be seen as some sort of a martyr on the alt-right and he is trying to paint exactly, as barb has said, the officials and all of these cases to step over what his supporters would consider a line and create that scenario. i remember debating this during the trump administration,
around the idea that ukraine was an independent state. i will let that sit right there. also given the historic events of today, you reveal in your book that donald trump had an obsession with stormy daniels and other women who he felt had wronged him and actually burned up 45 minutes of an important meeting riffing about these women, stormy daniels, the former pornography star who claims she had an affair with him another is a criminal trial starting in about two hours making it historic because this is the first former president to go on criminal trial all revolving around election interference and a payment to the pornography star he seemed to be obsessed with in a meeting. what else is in this book? >> those two are both true in the meeting we were referring
office. but let's focus on the specifics of the case. prosecutors alleged donald trump falsified five business records to hide hush money payments weeks before the 2016 election. as i mentioned, he violated both state tax and federal campaign finance laws. so are you saying that even if that's true he shouldn't have been charged and that he is above the law what i'm saying is that these prosecutors are using someone as whose testimony has been proven to be a liar. michael cohen has lied before congress multiple times. that's their main witness. i would say that he certainly is not someone who can be trusted to do the right thing during this jury trial, they're also using a woman's testimony who signed a letter saying that this affair did not happen, that she has testified the past that this never occurred and so now they're going forward with the case built on that and saying that because donald trump page legal bills, that now he can be prosecuted for something that even the person that alleged it happened is saying did not happen. so
that it really is about the dirt, your dirt nerd huge turret nerd. i'm proud of it critics are calling. >> challengers and nothing short of miraculous its fierce, sexy had deliriously enjoyable. >> how does this happen? go after the same girl? not miss this movie, challengers need are friday, blue carbon, plus cnn film tonight at nine donald trump will be back in a new york courtroom tomorrow morning for the first criminal trial of a former president. but it will not be the first time that someone running for president and he has faced legal jeopardy over an alleged affair. cnn's jessica dean has the story donald trump claims the prosecution against him in the hush money trial is unprecedented assault nothing like this has ever happened before. it's never been anything like it while it is