that either. but i don t believe, and i really strongly, you know, want to argue against the idea that this is some kind of ruse all stunned, that it was organised by putin with his knowledge and consent to flush out traitors, or that it was designed to confuse ukraine and get them to launch an overambitious counterattack. i think there is a lot of this conspiratorial thinking about, and i don t think that is true. this is terribly damaging for putin, it makes him look we d delude weak, and it is terribly bad for russian morale on the front. it makes him look weak. russian morale on the front. it makes him look weak. russian morale on the front. it makes him look weak. edward, in your art ument makes him look weak. edward, in your argument in makes him look weak. edward, in your argument in the makes him look weak. edward, in your argument in the times makes him look weak. edward, in your argument in the times today, - makes him look weak. edward, in your argument in the
paragraph 20 and page 71 which seeks to go much further than that. it talks about, it s not what the prime minister said, talks about, it s not what the prime ministersaid, it s talks about, it s not what the prime minister said, it s the interpretation given by members of this house, by the media and by the public. the former prime minister, borisjohnson cannot be held responsible for what people thought he may have meant. he should be held responsible if this report is to hold any water on what he said. i think my right honourable friend for that. of course, we. taste think my right honourable friend for that. of course, we. that. of course, we. we really must here that. of course, we. we really must here what that. of course, we. we really must here what the that. of course, we. we really must here what the honourable | that. of course, we. we really- must here what the honourable lady has to must here what the honourable lady has to say must here what the honourable lady
that this will do nothing for energy security because it will simply get sold on international markets, just because it s for act in the uk doesn t mean it ll get used in the uk. what the government should be doing is the obvious thing, which is insulating people s homes, getting that local authority led home installation programme, which is the fastest, most effective way of getting people s prices down. the art ument getting people s prices down. the argument from liz truss and her government was that it was part of british self sufficiency and energy, a programme of potential self sufficiency. we ve seen that if we are dependent on russia for gas, that leaves us in a very vulnerable position. self sufficiency was liz truss s argument, but you re saying that was pie in the sky? i’m truss s argument, but you re saying that was pie-in-the-sky? i m saying she needs to that was pie-in-the-sky? i m saying she needs to get that was pie-in-the-sky? i m saying she needs to get her tha
place. d0 see another sport fitting in its lace. , ., see another sport fitting in its lace. y., . see another sport fitting in its lace. . , see another sport fitting in its lace. ., , ., ., see another sport fitting in its nlace. . , . ., ., place. do you agree this addition to the sort place. do you agree this addition to the sport could place. do you agree this addition to the sport could open place. do you agree this addition to the sport could open up place. do you agree this addition to the sport could open up the - place. do you agree this addition to the sport could open up the sport i place. do you agree this addition to| the sport could open up the sport to those who would never dream of getting involved in modern pentathlon? it could make it more accessible to different people and more accessible to different types of athletes. i more accessible to different types of athletes. ., , , more accessible to different types of athletes of athletes. i don t buy into that