philadelphia's. we begin tonight with the new details of the contact between officials at the highest level of the obama era justice department and that former british spy. long after the fbi cut ties with this christopher steele character and the trump dossier author well what happened? bruce ohr, who was at the time a senior justice department official continued to maintain extensive contact with steele. he wasn't supposed to. this according to new emails fox news has obtained. bruce ohr's new connection to this whole sword i did affair is made worse when you consider his wife nellie. fox news has confirmed she worked for the outfit fusion gps during the 2016 election. explicitly hired to help investigate trump and russia related subjects. if you think the trump legal team isn't following all of
information. christopher steele was not to have contact with the fbi after they had to disassociate themselves from him when he, against policy, was leaking information to the press. >> right. >> now it turns out from these emails that were discovered, that wasn't the case. he had ongoing contact with members of the fbi, including from august all the way through into 2017. >> right. now i think what's more disturbing is that his wife was working for fusion gps. i mean it's one thing to say the contact continues. >> bruce ohrs's wife. >> some people maintain contact with colleagues after they're cut off but where his wife had an interest in the fusion gps research getting pushed, the fact that ohr is the one that was involved in this is a little disturbing. i think they're calling hearings next week to determine what kind of, whether anything substantive was said or done. certainly it's troubling. >> bob goodlatte wants to bring
everybody back. >> right. >> guy let's go to you on this. it seems like getting information, key pieces of information out of the justice department, is -- pulling teeth, pulling whatever you want to, go it's really difficult, but the information kind of trickles out slowly. how conceivable is it that bruce ohr didn't know what his wife was working on at fusion gps? the connection between trump and any russian related topics? >> laura, not at all! i mean come on! these guys, ohr and his wife, they shouldn't be touching anything on this with a ten foot pole. it's so clear to me there's a conflict, there's an appearance of i mpropriety. they the shouldn't have had anything to do with this investigation w. this case, any submissions to the fisa court, any of this business and they know this. i don't understand, i hope congress continues to -- look i
love the justice department, i'm a product of the justice department but congress needs to continue to beat them over the head for more transparency, that's what this case needs. >> james your reaction to all these latest developments? >> yeah it's a huge red flag, laura. i was with doj 17 years. seven in dc. i can't for the life of me figure out any good explanation for why bruce, who i know, was sitting down with a dee commissioned inform the habit and then to add to that that the fbi had people writing up 302 reports. it sounds like they dee commissioned this inform the hadn't and fully the continued to keep using him. that's troublesome. the other is to go back to the fisa warrant, they said we speculate that maybe this was a politically motivated dossier and they swear off that christopher steele knew that t i just don't understand how steele could be having these meetings with bruce, with bruce's
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level.
with federal judges. look, i don't mind that the prosecutor's are being aggressive, that they're standing up for their position. i don't know if i would have filed something like that, and instead probably would have asked for a sidebar and said, hey judge, you know you told the injury, injury i, you said something yesterday, i'm not sure it was correct. could you remind the jury that what you say is not evidence and you don't have an opinion nick? >> james one of the uncomfortable exchanges and there are many during the past several days but some of it is entertaining. there is one point where judge ellis thinks that one of the lawyers for mueller is not looking at him. and so the judge says, i'm here mr. andres, like i'm here from the ben of, andres says i'm sorry, judge i'm listening. ellis says i know but when you look down it's as if to say you know that's bs i don't want to listen to any more from you.
he's making us look like an i did i don'ted in front of the jury, you have no recourse, either you take it or file something or find some way to address it with the court. i think they hit a critical mass where they said we're going to have to take this on more publicly, not a sidebar, tell the judge here is a couple instances where you're wrong, and try to get him to step back. it's a tough spot for a litigant to be in but i'm not critical of the fact they filed a motion. it's now or never. >> didn't he make that poor greg andres cry? i'm sorry but you have to have your big boy pants on when yl you're before judge ellis. he's a tough judge. nothing happened today. there was a mysterious recess this morning at about, i think it was like 10:50 or so. they had a sidebar, then it was recess, no one -- it was not
explained. then they readjourned after two and then started talking about how rick gates took out a lone for 200,000 for sports tickets. is that normal? start in the morning, have a recess for four hours and then come back? maybe ellis wanted to cool things down? >> it's just speculation because we don't know. what i've heard around the courthouse is there may have been a jury issue. >> it was under seal. he didn't go back to chambers, effort went in the direction of the jury room. so there may have been an issue that he was talking to them about, either someone red a newspaper 3er. >> it's under seal so we don't know. i'm watching it, i'm like wait a second it stopped. i need this to keep going. i wish i was in the courtroom, it's fascinating. i want to get everyone's thoughts on whether president trump will sit down with
treating him like a target. >> is there any way the special counsel will accept the terms that trump's legal team offered? >> laura, not in a million years. the president will never sit down voluntarilily and speak to these guys. he would be crazy to. the special counsel i think bob is tough as a nail. he's hard is a rock. he will issue the grand jury subpoena and they'll file their motion to quash and it will make its way up through the supreme court. >> we're going to have you guys back a lot when that happens. that's going to go on for some time. fantastic conversation guys, thank you so much. have a great weekend. if you heard heads exploding across hollywood, kanye west doubled down on his support for donald trump! ♪ keep it comin' love. if you keep on eating, we'll keep it comin'. all you can eat riblets and tenders at applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.
about policies, because i'm not a politician like that but it represented overcoming fear, and doing what you felt, no matter what anyone said, saying you can't bully me, news, hip hop community, they can't bully me. >> laura: remarks from kanye west on jimmy kimmel are giving hollywood problems. he claimed his support for president trump and clearly he's got no plans to stop fighting against the anti-trump group think and as he said the bul bullying of the entertainment industry. joining us , eric let's start with you, kanye west, he's an interesting cat, interesting character. he has a huge following. and. >> very much so. >> laura: i find it just
fascinating that it's controversial for someone to say i think for myself. you won't put words in my mouth. you won't tell me the how to -- what to believe or for whom to vote. i'm my own person. somehow that's a point of controversy in the group think that is the entertainment industry today. i think he's just smashing the stereotype, and i think it's freaking people out. your reaction? >> well i don't think it's freaking people out. i think koen yeah is trying to play both sides of the fence. he's always been a free thinker. a long time ago he stood up on national tv and said george bush didn't care about black people. he's always thought for himself. he's trying to cater to both sides of the fence. he wants to maintain the fact he does support trump but in such a way that could possibly apiece his followers who may not support trump. it's a tactical marketing skill on his behalf rather than
bullying. he's a multimillion air, there is no way he can of bullied for who he chooses to vote for. >> kevin you understand what this is ultimately all about. >> absolutely. >> laura: there's a certain subset of the american political world that says if you are of a certain background or certain elth in his sir, certain race there is only one direction you can go in, whether it's clarence thomas or walter williams or tom sole or any given number of free thinkers out there. they're vilified in some ways. >> yep. >> laura: kevin i find it to be a fascinating conversation. >> it is. it is not just entertainment laura the way you set it up. it's the black community that will on is extra size you. kanye got it right. you will be bullied, he named everybody in the mix, the liberals, media, guys like this guy will bully you. koen yeah said what he said.
there was no upside for him in this. he wasn't catering to any particular side. he said i'm a human being, i'm going to think for myself, i'm not going to let anybody determine what i say as a man. >> i let you talk, he impacted himself. not only has donald trump raise the the level of black support. he doubled to 29% now because people are finally starting to wake up. kanye brought a level of consciousness to many blacks in america who feel eye the dent cli the same. i have been a conservative my entire life. i don't know what that wake up means, many people need conway to say something like that. it is the left that are the biggest but his on the planet. >> they're not but his just because they disagree. the simple fact of the matter is there's not a disagree with the republican party more says but the black community it has not been in their best interest. if kanye wishes to align himself
with that, most black african american community don't support that's the reality of the situation. >> not the same. >> laura: i think whether it's the violence in chicago, it had a huge spike under rom emanuel, democratic leadership, democrat is a promo jay of obama, things have gotten worse. you see the african community in the hardest hit neighborhood saying we want new leadership, it's not working. >> absolutely. laura let me respond to one other thing. no, no, no, you talked earlier. it is an issue. conway west was threatened. black conservatives like myself get threatened all the time. i have never threatened anybody that differs from me plate clay and i never will. >> that doesn't mean that liberals are not threatened. >> you said kanye west hasn't been threatened, there were rappers that came out and said you have a concert we're going
to be there. a guy that was a crip said he wanted to threat ten him. don't pretend this doesn't happen. >> laura: i think debate is a good thing. i think it's positive. if it's just more chatter there is nothing positive that comes of it. let's hope something good comes of this. i want to get our take on this national anthem protest, because it's reigniting now in the nfl, last night really cool, fun preseason games, a handful of players took knees or raised fifrpts. the president tweeted out in part, quote numerous players from different teams wanted to show outrage at something most of them are unable to define. they make a for tune doing what they love. find another way to protest. you have kenny stills out there saying look at my twitter feed. i explain why i'm doing what i'm doing. look at my social media.
it's not just a whim. i mean this, and he's sticking up for his right to do what he does. >> and i think that when we speak about bullying in politics, we have the biggest bully in the white house right now, given the fact that this situation has turned on racial lines in the fact that by trying to make it about the military. the players have been very adamant over and over it is not about the military, some of them have fathers, underingless, brothers, mothers, sisters who have served in the military, it is about bringing attention to the racial in jus tisz that have been done by the police and other instruments of government ni in this case. i do agree they need to transform to a more political base similar to what we saw happen in st. louis where the prosecutor was defeated by a democratic, more progressive opponent, maybe some of these athletes should take their protests to the polling places to draw out these people, the
prosecutor's, the district attorney's, the people, judges. >> laura: hold on. eric, i think what people -- i don't know says people don't have the right, they have the right to do whatever they want, say whatever they want, first amendment, cool, more speech is better. all that is fine. i think what some of the fans feel like is everything is so infected with politics, can we have some areas where we can all just get together and root for our teams without having to get into a political thing? i think that's what more people are kind of ishged by, not the fact they're speaking out but they want one zone where there's no politics. kevin your reaction. >> i think that's part of it. the idea it became racial because donald trump is the president is ridiculous. he was protecting the flag. america first, make america great again. he have the pointed out the inconsistencies in the black lives matter movement and the fact that these guys roorm l really were more self indulgent. let me just finish.
the fact of the matter was it is self indulgent move by colin cap cap and he's hurting the league and people understand that. look, you can try to make this black and white. the same problems that were persisting in the community, so-called policing issues, were happening during the time of obama. why didn't somebody take a knee then? they waited for donald trump so he could be the person to do it? >> who said they waited for donald trump? it got to a point where they had to do something about it, it coincided with donald trump. but the question is, if this had happened while obama was president do you think he would take the same position that donald trump is? >> laura: of course not. no, he wouldn't have at all. you're right about that, eric, he would have problem when i supported the players and what they're doing. but the owners had this policy in place and they've put it on the shelf now hoping to figure it out. guys have a great weekend. have you noticed recently have often some liberals invoke
ronald reagan to make a left wing political point? a reagan by go on good afternoon per talked about the truth. a five year old girl molested by an illegal immigrant. the u.s. attorney lays blame with city officials, he'll join us.
expected to get as close as four million miles to the sun's surface. it will set a record as the fastest object to leave the earth. now back to the ingraham angle. log to to fox news.com for more news. have a great friday night. >> laura: have you noticed how the trump presidency sir is spawning a lot of bizarre trends on the left? one of them would have been unthinkable until a short time ago. ronald reagan is suddenly en vogue with liberals. if only the 409 president was alive to hear their prays. joining me now is bill bennett who served as secretary of education under president reagan, i worked for him full disclosure. along with craig shirley the author of four best sellers on ronald reagan, including reagan rising. great to see both of you. billy find this to be
fascinating we now have all these liberals coming out and saying, well, the trump folks, on any given number of issues, gosh if only they were more like reagan. well how do you process this today? >> yeah well it's kind of funny, isn't it? a rosie memory changing the way things were. i don't remember it being very pleasant back then, serving with ronald reagan, with the liberals in the media. there is a line from shakes peer that says he's good being god but one has to say, whatever criticisms came down during the reagan era and there were a lot of them, i got some, you got some, you were working for me as you said, ronald reagan got plenty. it's nothing compared to what donald trump is getting. so if they can use ronald reagan, to beat up donald trump, they will do it. and they can do it with a straight face, i don't know how they pull off the straight face. >> laura: craig, you always re mind us of this fact, that the
left will do anything to regain power, even invoking the political figure they thought was basically enemy. i want to play flashback sound from some of our favorites in the media. i believe this was during the administration, right after the president -- yeah right after he passed away. let's watch. >> did his vision include extraordinary deficits? did his vision include cutting the budgets for education and the back of the hand in terms of -- >> are you saying history will not be kind to him? >> i don't -- no, i don't think history particularly will be kind. i don't think history has any reason to be kind to him. >> i used to say i thought if you were down on your luck and you got through the secret series, got down in the white house, mr. president, he would literally give you the shirt off his back and then he would sign legislation throwing our kids
off lunch programs. >> laura: he wanted grandma to eat alpo. remember that guys? >> ketchup was a vegetable, too. this is a pattern that plays itself out many times. when eisenhower was president, liberals said he couldn't reed if his lips were chapped, barry gold water was attacked and denounced as crazy now he's held up by liberals as a para gone of virtue. the left hated richard nixon. i saw a lefty favor richard nixon to donald trump, gerald ford, both bushes were hated by the left until they were no longer in office, then they become convenient tools to bash the current occupant of the white house, it's nothing new but especially with reagan. they know nothing about reagan. as i said earlier to you this
morning laura they're in over their heads, they don't know what they're talking about. we all worked for president reagan and on the issue of immigration a lot of democrats are saying the republican party of donald trump if only they were more like reagan on immigration. let's play a few of the choice sound bites from president reagan on immigration. >> the simple truth is that we've lost control of our own board percent and no nation can do that and survive that. i've spoken of the shining city all my political life. in my mind it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind swept, god blessed and teeming with people of all kinds living in harman any and peace. if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. >> bill, you can take a hit at that one. first of all i get schiffers
every time i hear him speak. the left takes that part of the city on the hill, anyone can come. ronald reagan wanted everyone to come of. then they forget the part about the wall and the country without borders isn't a country. >> it oh could toured me while you were talking to craig, maybe two, three, four elections in the future we will see videotape of donald trump saying, the liberals saying now those were the days when people had a heart and soul laf last. >> laura: i don't think so. >> just a fun experiment here laura, could it possibly be worse, until it gets worse? but, no. >> he might be right. >> but there's sto much the two share in common. craig was saying or maybe i read it did in his book. the commitment to a defense build up, which was so essential to both of them. focus on the wall, reagan wanted
to tear one down, the right one, and trump wants to build one up and that's the right one, too. they're very different permits and yet very much going in the same direction, it seems to me. the thing i think, i would be interested in craig's point of view on this, having served proudly for ronald reagan, i think this is a more conservative cabinet than ronald reagan had. don't you? >> yeah, i think so. don't forget bill the bench, you were a great conservative in the cabinet, and ed meese, but the bench was a lot thin ter. this is a byproduct, there is a lot mortal lent to be available for the trump administration that wasn't available in 1980. >> laura: good point. think about that. think of all the people that were waiting in the wings to get appointed to the appellate courts. all those 50 something year olds, late '40s, they were children of the reagan era, were they not, bill? >> absolutely. >> laura: i wouldn't be doing
what i'm doing. the left would probably do that, if i didn't work for you and reagan, i wouldn't be doing any of this. >> no triple-a and double a leagues very much highly populated with the right people. i remember laura at our place, we got known as fort reagan. at one point we had 134 political appoint ease. and i remember senator wiker who is supposed to be a republican saying what are you doing with all these political appoint ease? i said i think we're doing it right. we won, we won the election. that was a great training camp. it's interesting to see where they've gone. famous television permits and others. >> laura: they can blame you bill. guys thanks so much. the so-called blue wave for democrats may already been physician listening out? why? good old nn. details after this.
ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. this condition has not been reported with entyvio. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach. . ♪ ♪ . >> laura: thanks to nn the so-called blue wave may be nancy pelosi may be fading out a
little bit. the house minority leader is becoming the shining star of the gop attack ads leading up to the midterms. here is a little sample. >> failed liberal policies is at it again, this time running for congress, this time he's not alone. now nancy pelosi and her washington democrats are bankrolling his campaign. it's the pelosi agenda in washington. a vote for paul davis is a vote for nancy pelosi. >> laura: democratic house members smell blood. dozens of them and counting will not commit or out right they refuse to support pelosi continuing as the donald trump house leader. joining us now to analyze rachel campos duffy and dezlin figurer row. tezlin, all parties have their person who you want to kind of move on. it's just the way it is. republicans have had the same
issue, you know, not so much with boehner but the republicans wanted him to move on and ultimately ed. what do you see, though, you have this incredible number of democrat incumbents now at 51 who say, huh-uh, will not support her? >> well it's funny you asked me what do i see because i feel like i'm a photograph if he, just last week i photograph if he sized that the blue wave, someone was bound to drown. just call me noah, laura. at the end of the day people are ready to move on. not just democrats saying they want to get rid of nancy pelosi, but republicans and independents as well. three quart polled say the time is over for nancy pelosi. it's sad because poorly tim ryan when he tried to run against nancy in 2006, people thought it was a joke. over 20 democrat leaders say they will not support her in june. now in august it's over 50 who are asking nancy to move on.
it reminds me of the old stocker girlfriend that just refuses to stop calling on the phone, over and over repeatedly and doesn't understand the relationship is over. >> laura: you crack me up. i needed to laugh on friday that cracked me up. rachel, first of all the republicans kind of putting all their eggs in the anti-pelosi agenda? they have economic practices pert, relative peace out there. the policy thing gets old for me. nevertheless i guess it's kind of good, i guess. but don't both parties have these people who just refuse to move on? >> well you can walk and chew gum. you can to you all the good news that the republicans and donald trump agenda has brought about in their district and remind voters that make no mistake, i don't care what those 50 democrats are saying if the democrats take control of congress nancy pelosi will be the leader of the house,
democrats are in step all the time. she will be the leader. and by the way, she embodies everything middle americans hate about washington. she represents san francisco, looney policies that never worked. the republicans are back home kind of enthusiastic now. i don't think they were feeling so good a month ago, they're feeling good, back home, seeing the impact of their agenda, talking to constituents and face-to-face reminding them of who brought them about, who said it was going to be armageddon and who called.bonuses crumbs. >> laura: they're personalizing it. >> they're working hard in their district. >> laura: they have to personalize their agenda. speaking of real clear politics average. let's put it up on the screen. today the democrats have a 5% advantage. but a month ago they had an 8.2% advantage, bloomberg opinion
headline, by the way, kind of extends this conversation on this. pelosi is the wrong target for democrats. joe cunningham saying the democratic party needs new leadership. i will not vote for nancy pelosi as speaker. time to move forward and win again. 34 say they're neither for nor against pelosi but 42 of the parties' nominees say they will not support nancy pelosi. well who had the juice, though, to take on pelosi? let's say the democrats pick up the seats they need to take the majority? you have to have something to be -- you can't beat something with nothing. who beats pelosi? >> it's amazing that they continue to keep pushing nancy pelosi on people, it's amazing she won't sit down. a lot has changed in the last two years. i don't know the answer to the question. i would like to see them support congresswoman barbara lee.
let's see if they're willing to put an african american female in office. but that will be going a stretch. >>. >> laura: i want maxine waters as a speaker of the house, aunt i maxine i like. she's kind of fun. she doesn't like trump but they makes politics interesting. we're out of time, but we'll continue this conversation on radio next week. thanks guys have a great weekend. fill mal tell fia policies are slammed. u.s. attorney for philly says enough is enough. he joins us with his plans to take on local officials next.
involving the safrpg sank status of philadelphia. tell me why from your perspective and then we will get into the specific case, why sanctuary status is harmful for public safety. >> well fundamentally those of us in law enforcement aren't supposed to play favorites. those of us who are prosecutor's aren't supposed to play favorites. that's a fundamental principal. we're the supposed to enforce the law in a fair non-partisan manner. sanctuary cities have turned that whole principle on its head and they poll lit at this size law enforcement. they stand for the proposition that a certain group of people are not going to be subject to our laws, for political purposes. namely we're talking about illegal immigrants. >> laura: well they make the opposite claim. those who are defending the sanctuary city policies,
including the mayor and his boosters, mary kinney, they will say sanctuary status keeps the place safer because illegal immigrants won't go to the authorities because they're afraid of being deported. it makes the city less safe if you don't have it in place. how do you respond to that? >> i think actually they have it exactly backwards. they do say that they think that it's fostering trust among the it community and law enforcement, they did not enforce immigration laws, actually what for theers trust between the community and law enforcement is when the community knows that law enforcement is not going to play favorites. if they know the rule of law is going to be respected the broader community you, therefore, believes that law enforcement is doing their job. so when the proponents of sanctuary cities make that argument that you just articulated i think they have it exactly backwards. >> laura: the d amount of philadelphia is not too pleased
with your criticism of the sanctuary city policy. he said about your statement linking it rape by this juan ramon vasquez who was released,raped a member of his own family, a five year old child, he said well, that's very dramatic to somehow link the sanctuary status of this rape. the trump administration has made it so immigrant children can get raped. they're linking trump to you, the deportation of actual victims of domestic violence and you're seeing this bubble up with the judge versus jeff sessions yesterday. so how do you respond to that? he's hitting you hard saying you're basically, this is typical trump administration stuff from you. >> fundamentally with that statement what is wrong, he's going political. i am doing my best as a law enforcement officer to enforce
the law in a neutral non-party an a political manner. when you are a politicizing law enforcement, i think the d.a. in philadelphia unfortunately takes a political approach to a lot of issues in law enforcement. what i'm saying is respect for the rule of raw is a non-partisan neutral. >> laura: but they're saying we're not the immigration force. we have our hands full already. >> well, the fundamental problem again is that not only are sanctuary cities, in my view, wrong, but they're essentially un-american. let me explain that a little bit. when you come before the law in america, it's not supposed to matter who you are, or where you're from, who your parents are or the like. everybody is supposed to be treated equally. if you poll lit size the law and say we're not going to enforce the law against a certain group of people we're only going to
enforce it against others you're essentially doing something un-american i believe because you're not respecting the rule of law >> laura: it's not equal justice under the law. let's get back to the case, 2014, arrested on an aggravated assault, released, illegal immigrant. a year and-a-half later he was found to have raped a five year old little girl, member of his own family. and then of course when he's released in 2014, that was sank tank city time, and they say well making that leap from his release to the rape and sanctuary policies that's unfair. do you skwaurlly -- obviously it's his fault for doing the rape, he's liable, but do the safrpg sank city policy facilitate the rape of this little girl? >> it's 100% responsible for it. that is non-controversial. what happened in the timeline was mr. vasquez was deported in 2009. he then illegally reentered the
country. he was arrested for an assault in 2014. we placed a detainer on him which is a request to give the feds a heads up, we take him to federal custody and deport him. unfortunately philadelphia because they're a safrpg sank city do not respect detainers, so when mr. vasquez was released in 2014 we didn't know about it. the philadelphia prison officials didn't tell us about it. he would have been deported to honduras and had no further opportunity to commit crimes in philadelphia, instead he went into the community and raped a five year old. >> laura: may or kin i, you might have seen this video 1 or two or three times, re acted to the court ruling that affirmed the ability to have the sanctuary status without any federal diminution of funding. ed the big snoopy dance, let's watch. >> a sanctuary city. yes.
>> a sanctuary city, yes. >> laura: so he's thrilled that they could cut off access to the feds. to the city arrest data baby. so the federal government, even if they wanted access in this sanctuary policy, they could not have access even to know who is in the state pen. >> correct. and one of the larger issues that is at stake here is in the post nine eleven world it's very very important that all levels of law enforcement, state, local, federal, that they're talking to each other. >> laura: i thought after 9/11 everyone is supposed to talk to each other. aren't we all supposed to be working together as americans to keep our communities safe? i do not understand the sank tank stuff. i don't. i don't get it. >> the problem is prior to 9/11 a lot of law enforcement weren't communicating. we've made a lot of progress. having a sanctuary policy where the locals are not communicating
with the federal authorities and are defying federal law it's a step backwards. we do that at our own peril. >> laura: you're not a political figure but you live in philadelphia, in the area, what is your sense about the constituents? i mean minorities, the poor, the disadvantaged are the ones vikt highs did the most by illegal immigrant crime. any sense about how they're feeling about this may or? >> again i think that what people want is they want to know their law enforcement officers, whether federal or local or state, are enforcing the rule of law in a non-partisan fairmaner, treating everybody fairly. it's fundamentally un-american and unfair to not enforce the law against an entire population. >> laura: any sense about the nationwide injunctions, sanctuary city, defund? we have other individual federal district court rulings on immigrati
immigration? >> well first of all on that sanctuary city's case that you mentioned earlier, the last word hasn't been written on. that there was a case in my district that was ruled on. but there's lots of these cases going on around the country. they all sort of percolate their way up. >> laura: they're supposed to. there will shouldn't be a nationwide injunction with one district court. >> no, there shouldn't be, you want several courts to look at an issue and eventually these things make their way to the supreme court will have have their final word. >> laura: are you having fun? >> it's a lot of work but the i'm doing my best enjoying it. >> laura: thank you. great to see you. thank you so much. we appreciate the u.s. attorney joining us and the job he's doing. we'll be right back. no... maybe you could trust that during your fantasy draft ...no, no, no. the computer won't auto-draft a kicker, in the 7th round. maybe you can trust you won't be kept at night because you auto-drafted a kicker, in the 7th round. (woman laughing) maybe you could trust that for the next 16 weeks
you won't think about auto-drafting a kicker, in the 7th round. or... ...you could just trust duracell. (duracell mnemonic) until i held her. managing my type 2 diabetes wasn't my top priority. i found my tresiba® reason. now i'm doing more to lower my a1c. i take tresiba® once a day. tresiba® controls blood sugar for 24 hours for powerful a1c reduction. (woman) we'd been counting down to his retirement. it was our tresiba® reason. he needs insulin to control his high blood sugar and, at his age, he's at greater risk for low blood sugar. tresiba® releases slow and steady and works all day and night like the body's insulin. (vo) tresiba® is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar,
which may cause dizziness, sweating, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar. low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening. injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, fast heartbeat, extreme drowsiness, swelling of your face, tongue or throat, dizziness or confusion. (man) i found my tresiba® reason. find yours. (vo) ask your health care provider about tresiba®. covered by most commercial health insurance and medicare part d plans. ♪ ♪ . >> laura: thank you to all you fans out there. wasn't this a fun week? we're gonna be right back here monday night of course. in the meantime have a wonderful weekend. not many summer weekends left. enjoy your families and your friends, i know i will.
with federal judges. look, i don't mind that the prosecutor's are being aggressive, that they're standing up for their position. i don't know if i would have filed something like that, and instead probably would have asked for a sidebar and said, hey judge, you know you told the injury, injury i, you said something yesterday, i'm not sure it was correct. could you remind the jury that what you say is not evidence and you don't have an opinion nick? >> james one of the uncomfortable exchanges and there are many during the past several days but some of it is entertaining. there is one point where judge ellis thinks that one of the lawyers for mueller is not looking at him. and so the judge says, i'm here mr. andres, like i'm here from the ben of, andres says i'm sorry, judge i'm listening. ellis says i know but when you look down it's as if to say you know that's bs i don't want to listen to any more from you.