in the law. so it s not exactly the law they want to change at the core. and that would be a process through congress as well. what they want to do is ask congress for morley way and say can t dhs, department of homeland security use their discretion more to send these kids home quicker? because in reality, even though they have to go through this lengthy process, the vast majority of them are just going to be sent home anyways. so you look at it, it seems like a huge waste of time and money. but it does protect some kids. and that was the cause of it in the first place. all right, michelle kosinski, i appreciate it. whether or not you think the administration has the right answer to the problem, it s hard to imagine they have done the best job of explaining things. here is white house spokesman josh earnest yesterday when asked specifically what will happen to all these kids. these children who have been apprehended will go through the immigration court process. and if they are fo
was originally about to stop trafficking of kids. is there any talk from the white house to get the law itself that gives special attention to these kids to get it repeal snd. right, it seems obvious. the law is not exactly fair. it only covers some countries, doesn t cover mexico. similar to wet foot dry foot. you come from one country and get more leeway and another country you get shipped back. there is that problem and the fact that it s keeping the problem going. it s keeping the kids here in some cases for years. so the obvious question, is yours, change the law but the white house says okay, it wasn t even our law but not so fast. the original intent was to deal with children who are being trafficked. they do see a humanitarian value in the law. it s not exactly the law they want to change at the core. that would be a process through congress. what they want to do is ask congress for more leeway and say can t dhs, department of homeland security use their discretion more to se