Present. Please help me walk in him. His [applause] it is very much a pleasure to be here. I say you all for joining me. I say you all for joining me for the lunching of this book today as the day of relief from the publisher. Pegasus press. I am particularly pleased to see in the front row, my family. And of number of my directors of researcher and want to call particular attention to stephanie who is looking in the back there. My director of research at this time he played a major brawl in the creation of what i hope will be this interesting product for you. I would like to put this in the context of the history and profiles. Or my specialty during my cia career where i was recruited for cia for the purpose of the founding Pilot Program assessing World Leaders a distance. And i gathered some knowledgeable Clinical Psychology consultants to work with me on this project. And i based it on the case study that as a trained psychiatrist i used the standing nations of mental illness. But i
Thank you everybody for coming. Please continue to enjoy your lunch. Im tim carney, im a visiting fellow here at the American Enterprise institute as well as being a the commentary ted tor at the Washington Examiner. Were here to talk about health care. But i want to ask a specific question about health care. And its a question that some people on the Free Enterprise side, the free market conservative or libertiarian side dont always ask. Kui, bono in latin, or who benefits. I think sometimes people on the right or right of center are uncomfortable with that question in policy debates because they say why should it matter who benefits . Because we see Elizabeth Warren will say a tax cut is bad because rich people benefit. But i think its actually a very important thing to talk about. One, it definitely influences our debates. If you remember in the 2008 campaign and the passage of obamacare, barack obama certainly thought it was very important to point out that he was battling, you kno
Thank you, everyone, for coming. Im tim carney. Im a visiting fellow here at the american enter Price Institute as being the commentary editor at the Washington Examiner. We are here talking about health care and we want to ask a specific question about health care and its a question of the Free Enterprise side and the free market consentive or libertarian side dont always ask in latin or who benefits . I think sometimes people on the right or right of enter are uncomfortable with that question because they say why should it matter who benefits because we see Elizabeth Warren will say a tax cut is bad because rich people benefit, but i think its actually a very important thing to talk about. One definitely influences our debates. If you remember in the 2008 campaign and the passage of obamacare, barack obama certainly thought it was very important to point out that he was battling, you know, the Health Care Sector. That he was battling the drugmakers or he was battling the insurers and
The House Committee and the judiciary will come toto order we can declare recesses at any time we welcome everyone to this mornings hearing on the assault weapons i now recognize myself. Assault weapons have been repeatedly v used for violence on her citizens just the last two years, las vegas, parkland, pittsburgh, vegas, parkland, pittsburgh, mid and odessa. We have seen powerful shootings and Mass Shootings in those communities shattered by violence. But todays hearing is whether america will tolerate weapons but simply put civilian assault weapons or semi automatic versions of military weapons. And now to feel as quickly as possible now to rapidly and repeatedly fire human targets without stopping to reload designed for maximum bloodshed. And then to address the assault weapons estate laws have proven to easy to evade. This is one reason i support a national ban on assault weapons despite californias ban a man could drive across the border into nevada to buy a 75 round highcapacity
Kind of web fueled violence be stopped radical hate by investors spread over the internet have often been followed by killing sprees government and Tech Companies are coming under mounting pressure to take action is that a correct balance between censoring violent content and maintaining freedom of speech this is inside story. Hello welcome to the program. From the weekends shootings in the United States to the mosque attacks in new zealand and many more besides they are all linked to websites which allow hate and radical speech the suspects thought to have sat manifestos before carrying out their murderous attacks they didnt use browsers we all logged into every day but a deeper darker layer of the internet where you can hide your identity and location be anonymous and difficult to track the subterfuge raises questions about the responsibility of Tech Companies and websites to control what can be posted governments are also exploring how to regulate the internet the u. S. President ha