acrimony, rage and revenge, literally threatening senators. it was a kind of unmasking, a revelation. and it is the reason that john paul stevens, a former justice of the supreme court said it was disqualifying. why other judges and lawyers around the country have said that they believe that it was disqualifying. no judge should threaten a potential litigant. and by the way, in blumenthal versus trump, a lawsuit on the -- clause i am a potential litigant, threatened potential lawyers who may appear before him, that issue of temperament is now front and center.m, and that so-called apology, it d was really a non-apology, more like an explanation, is far from good enough for me. i >> republicans who were briefed on that fbi report that interviewed, we think, around po ten witnesses say, basically, it clears their guy. they're forging ahead.