Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20190804:21:24:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
data and a true psychological theory to explain why it's quite possible that this president is the most sound minded person to ever occupy the white house. >> sean: you literally -- liberal heads are going to explode. >> that's the fun part of the madness, watching them go crazy over the fact that that he's pretty unfazed by them. and i believe that. and that's what drives them nuts. >> michael curry wrote a review of that at the best thing you could do for trump's ignore him. i say they are like drug addicts in the media, they wake up every day and if they don't get their hate for the day they break out into a sweat and they go into convulsions eventually. they have to have their drug and hating trump is a drug to them. >> and we have to watch it spewed across our television or written into clickbait headlines every single day. looks like mine that just tell the truth and take an honest approach using science -- you look at woodward's book for
president is the most sound minded person to ever occupy the white house. >> sean: you literally -- liberal heads are going to explode. >> that's the fun part of the crazyss, watching them go over the fact that that he's pretty unfazed by them. and i believe that. >> sean: and that's what drives them nuts. >> and that's what drives them nuts. >> sean: the best thing you can do for trump to just ignore him. here's what i want to know, i say they are like drug addicts in the media. they wake up every day and they are like addicts. if they do not get their fixation, their hate for the day, they break out into a sweat and they go into convulsions eventually. they have got to have a third drug and heating trump is a drug to a them. >> and we have to watch it spewed across our television or written into clickbait headlines every single day. books like mine that just tell the truth and take an honest approach using science, -- you
with the airliners, i don't think he's a guy that is looking out for u.s. interests. >> tucker: of course he's not looking for u.s. interests. >> you can go back and forth. as we did in '98, you can find extremists on both sides that say things that again i think are designed to get attention, clickbait. >> tucker: what you're saying is absolutely right but you also have people like, i don't know, the ranking democrat in the house intel committee who on the show accused me of carrying water for putin because i had sincere questions about the evidence of collusion. so you do have a kind of different level of extremism, i would argue, but it leads to this question, which is if trump is guilty of these crimes that virtually everyone on the left alleges, then why are we just saying out loud there's an impeachment coming? wire democrats ashamed of that? >> as to the question of extremism, there's a lot of extremism going on on both sides and i hope a thoughtful guy that you are that you would denounce it, the extremism that's occurring on the right.
real danger. >> tucker: meanwhile, the middle-class dies and nobody cares. thank you very much for that, great to see you. >> thanks a lot, tucker. >> tucker: so is it legal, is it even possible to enola presidency? julian epstein is a democrat and former counsel to the house judiciary committee and he joins us know. i have noticed that the left has become more than anything a religious movement in the use of the term annulment kind of proves it. if the presidency were unrolled as reich suggests, would heretics who persist on acknowledging that trump was once president, what they be punished? >> it's a funny way to put the question. i don't think annulment is a serious argument. i don't think we are at the threshold of impeachment yet. i think there is the tenancy going on with democrats right now as there was during the '98 clinton impeachment for people in the opposition party to scream loud and try to get attention and to screen kind of louder than the other because it helps with clicks on websites
>> do you want to see something that helps donald trump? listen to this joke. >> i will tell you one joke. do you know the difference between a crisis and a catastrophe? a crisis is jumping into the river and you can't swim. >> do you think that helps anybody? >> it certainly doesn't, and, if that had been set by republican member of congress, we would have called them out on it too. >> he has to know he's going to get out there. >> they criticized the president about tweeting and insults and the like, but they are great at throwing out left wing clickbait, that all these witless lemmings gobble up and regurgitate on everyone else in the form of hate.
is omarosa credible? >> it's because it's clickbait. and it's going to get people to tune in and they will watch it because it's fallacious and dirty and people who don't want to like trump love to hear that he used that word. then the tape got leaked and you have katrina person spending in another direction saying, i was just pacifying her. it's a sideshow without a doubt. the security issues are rail, and it dana perino wrote a wonderful piece about how something like this happen when she was in the bush white house. no one will renumber this in three weeks, but what you have done to the office of the presidency and is too important american institutions that will live on forever. she should have thought of that when she went in there and was recording people.
and there is a supreme court nominee who is wavering that the senate needs to take action on, i do not think that this will go any further than where it has in my opinion this is a little bit of a media grandstand. >> you talk about clickbait, that's essentially what what this was, you see the attorney general, even though we disagree on 99.9% of the things, but even defended the top lieutenant saying that he thinks he is doing a good job. >> harris: you are talking about jeff sessions putting out that comment. in support of rod rosenstein. >> this is the republican party that wants to have more interest in protecting the president of the united states instead of doing what the best interest of the united states. to speed on the relationship that we see has evidence is policy. >> of course attorney jeff central -- >> harris: did you throw me a side eye? that's true.
in my lifetime by a u.s. congress to protect a sitting russian president, because that is what this is about. this is all about trying to protect the interest of donald trump and his continued playing fdic and flirting with vladimir putin. if this congress does not at work to do, if we do not have people in flint, michigan, with out running water, clean water. >> harris: the department of justice that does not answer back undocumented, and i hear your incendiary comments, trying to get some clickbait on your twitter. but really, if the shoe were on the other foot, the whole point is that there are documents that congress is trying to see, and there is an effort to keep that from happening. >> a lot of this has been brought over himself, but if you are looking at this from a process standpoint, i do not think that this goes past the house, because of it data it would go over to the senate and take over all senate business,