Latest Breaking News On - Commentators - Page 3 : vimarsana.com

juries, than david not put together times a factor of ten. my experience has always been that actress juries, i think that diligence, i think there hey, attention enough, they can vast majority of the times they get it right and they smarter than these high-end legal commentators, deaf bone personal view you're good for my demographics. please keep listening. my work was on the civil side acts. let me ask you this. the other guy there famously said, it's the economy stupid. in the, is the economy going to trump? i'm going to ask you and then i'm going to ask carville in the end is all of this secondary to the price of eggs and milk i kinda think, yes, because i think the people who are hanging out there, we're going to decide this election are people who are concerned about their costs. >> i keep saying, you know, i feel deeply about these democracy issues in the rule of law. but if you're sitting around the kitchen table

media, including my former employer, the new york times. >> let us talk about his sentencing. i know you have a strong opinion on this. do you think donald trump could see jail time? >> absolutely. i know that most of the legal commentators have been saying they think it is unlikely. while that is true that wealthy white men with no past record in their 70s, typically on a first offense for white-collar crime, don't go to jail. sentencing also depends on the behavior of the accused. if you are contrite and knowledge that you did wrong, you typically get a lighter sentence. in donald's case, he has tenant criminal contents. after the jury came in he continued attacking the judge and attacking the system. i think he is inviting judge merchan to give him a sentence behind bars. frankly, i will be surprised if he does not get at least 30

Rumormongers in Taiwan to face sanctions

go out to b beyond npr and havee journalism. as a professor talked to my journalism students we have a conversation about what it means to be objective. what it means to be a journalist called balls and strikes and put things in context your audience that is what journalism is about. i think because the polarized nature of our country we, as journalist have been caught in the middle of the sigs and also as commentators been caught in the middle of these two things we have been forced to question the conversation around truth. i'll be remiss if not talking about this and having the conversation this week congress is very likely congress will ban tiktok which is also part of freedom of expression and freedom of speech it's a slippery slope what happens in other countries decide to ban facebook or decide to ban ex whiex-which is and american pros and what do we do? is a question have to ask ourselves how do we have this conversation questioned how do we have free speech in this country? shannon: we are paying for that change in the conversation to bring thank you very much see you next sunday put up next will take you behind the scenes for a look at how efforts of bipartisanship in the nation's

Channel 4 General Election coverage to be home of expert analysis fronted by Guru-Murthy and Maitlis with Rest Is Politics duo throughout the night… and Gogglebox

that we are told is going through his brain, which is whether it was on that tv show or in his business, or on the campaign trail or whatever, even in the white house he determines what he does on a minute-by-minute basis. and right now, for the next probably six weeks, that is not happening and it's driving you mad and we've had jaime can go republican commentators want trump to get elected on the show & on these panels say that if they were advising trump or if trump were listening to ma'am they would advise it instead of coming out and doing a grievance about the judge rejecting the bond or this or that about the case. it's kind of in the weeds that he should take the opportunity of this free air time to talk about what he would do as president for the american people. but that's not, that's not what mr. trump so as we know, donald trump thinks he's the smarter this person in the room. >> he may listen, but in the end, what we saw when he walked

andrew mccarthy. every one of them saying -- [inaudible] meaning there is no case. howard: so mostly right-leaning commentators. but nicole wallace on msnbc says we're not going to play this for you. we'll let you mow if he says something we think you should hear. you know, they bash him all a day long on msnbc, he speaks for about 4-5 minutes and suddenly, oh, we couldn't possibly expose our viewers to this. >> well, i mean, that's an editorial decision of a network whether they should or shouldn't have played it, i don't know. i do know that donald trump is a lawyer's nightmare as a client. having your client go out in the middle of a trial and free wheel about what is and what is not the opinion of legal scholars or experts about the case is not helpful. but that just shows that we're really doing two things here. one, there is a trial of a person who happens to be a former president who is on trial in manhattan. separately, that same person is running for president again. and so he is going to the, as

let's discuss this with our panel of cnn political commentators, democratic strategist maria cardona and republican strategist alice stewart together they host the podcast hot mics from left to right. >> thank you both so much for being with me this evening. marie, i want to start with you in the past and throughout all of donald trump's legal travails he has kept fundraising. he's been using this on the campaign trail to rally his base as this case gets underway, the first of ben different for donald trump? >> well, not in that he's going to continue to use it to rile up his base and to continue to try to get money from them. but the difference is alex, we are past the republican primary. >> he has his base already and even during the primary, we saw that he was losing anywhere between 11 and 20% of the votes during the republican primary. that is a huge red flag for him going into the general election now that we're in the general, he has got to start playing

go out to beyond npr and have te journalism. as a professor talked to my journalism students we have a conversation about what it means to be objective. what it means to be a journalist called balls and strikes and put things in context your audience that is what journalism is about. i think because the polarized nature of our country we, as journalist have been caught in the middle of the sigs and also as commentators been caught in the middle of these two things we have been forced to question the conversation around truth. i'll be remiss if not talking about this and having the conversation this week congress is very likely congress will ban tiktok which is also part of freedom of expression and freedom of speech it's a slippery slope what happens in other countries decide to ban facebook or decide to ban ex ex-which is and american propers and what do we do? is a question have to ask ourselves how do we have this conversation questioned how do we have free speech in this country? shannon: we are paying for that change in the conversation to bring thank you very much see you next sunday put up next will take you behind the scenes for a look at how efforts of bipartisanship in the nation's

>> as a vegan i find this discussion. >> like you would ever say that. >> i don't know who he is. >> do should she get a point to? >> jesse: all run the game. >> surly. [ simultaneous talking ] >> jesse: to which famous eighties actors said their movies were too wide, molly ringwald or susan sarandon. >> confident about this one. >> both going with molly, what is it? >> those movies, the movies that i'm so well known for. [ simultaneous talking ] 's pieta if you watch the five you all took -- automatically do well on the show the next category is donnie from the block which commentators said black people find trump relatable because of his indictments was it stephen or charlemagne the god is going to