owen paterson for 30 days after he was sent to have repeatedly broken lobbying rules. what happened was the vote was instead to set up a new committee to examine the whole process of discipline in parliament and that has the effect also putting his suspension on hold all that happens. the vote was very close in the end, a lot of mps, certainly in the end, a lot of mps, certainly in the opposition, who were very, did not think that it was quite the right way to do it, to put it mildly, and some tories as well, but with me as labour s emily thornberry. what do you make of the outcome this afternoon? let’s thornberry. what do you make of the outcome this afternoon? outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel beck outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel back of fl outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel back of it. i outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel back of it. the i outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel back of it. the last i outcome this afternoon? let s ust wheel back o
still stands for stub they are going to look at that still stands. i5 to look at that still stands. is he to look at that still stands. is he going to be suspended? he is not. he could he going to be suspended? he is not. he could be he going to be suspended? he is not. he could be. it could be a majority of tory he could be. it could be a majority of tory mps, set up on this committee, in order to help out owen paterson, committee, in order to help out owen paterson, they might decide they re going paterson, they might decide they re going to paterson, they might decide they re going to suspend owen paterson, yes, that is going to suspend owen paterson, yes, that is always possible. and i am nothing that is always possible. and i am nothing we could not improve the rules, nothing we could not improve the rules, i nothing we could not improve the rules, i am nothing we could not improve the rules, lam not nothing we could not improve the rules, i am not sayin
you have i think that this is what comes when you have a i think that this is what comes when you have a conservative mac government with a large majority, ust government with a large majority, just like government with a large majority, just like we did in the 905, they lose their just like we did in the 905, they lose their competence, they don t a conservative a majority. majority. emily thornberry, take ma ority. emily thornberry, take ou majority. emily thornberry, take ou ve majority. emily thornberry, take you very much majority. emily thornberry, take you very much for majority. emily thornberry, take you very much for this majority. emily thornberry, take you very much for this new - majority. emily thornberry, take i you very much for this new committee will be set up. how much bible that have? as we heard there, labour are not code of anything to do with it, snp are narco to have anything to do with it. what happens after that? not goin
same time and did president trump seem to be using mild language about vladimir putin. i m concerned and it s worth looking into. we don t know who these officials are that illegally leaked this information to the press so i don t know the level of the communications and we don t have any real facts. and filling in. and investigate michael flynn. we have a committee set up.
exactly been sealed when it comes to leaks. so leaks could be coming from inside the house? of course. there are lots of different places that, like i said, this material about general flynn was in the white house for 2 1/2 weeks before the resignation took place. so, yes, the leaks are an issue. but i don t like to see that used as, you know, as, oh, it s the leaks. that s the real issue. that s nonsense. the real issue is, what was what the russians were doing in our election process and whether there were connections with the campaign. i hate to see it go there, but we got to follow the facts. senator king, i ve got to let you go. are you going to be involved in these discussions senate democrats are having later this morning? yes, i will. what do you think will come out of that? i have no idea. it s a political it s a political party. it s going to be it will be a wide-ranging discussion. i m inclined to think at the end they re going to say, look, we have a commi