The us regulator authorises the Pfizer Biontech coronavirus vaccine. Donald trump says itll be rolled out immediately. And later tonight, anthonyjoshua defends his three boxing world heavyweight titles against kubrat pulev at wembley arena tonight. Now on bbc news, amol rajan speaks to the ofcom chief executive Melanie Dawes in the media show. Hello. This week, ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, put out a pretty stark warning. They said that traditional uk broadcasting is at risk without radical shake up. But at risk of what exactly . And what kind of shake up are they talking about . Already this year, ofcom has given the go ahead to two new tv channels, including one from Rupert Murdochs news uk, and ofcom is reportedly about to take on the massive task of regulating online harm, including social media platforms like youtube and instagram. But is a uk regulator really able to police the worldwide web . Well, im joined by the person best able to answer those questions. Dame Melanie Da
So from the standpoint of eliminating that possibility that there was in this case a conus in the United States connection, i think thats another important attribute of section 215. Thank you. General alexander, under current law when one of these socalled mistakes occurs that you refer to in your testimony, i believe you said they were somewhat less than 3000 of them had occurred, that the current law requires at the immediate report those to the fisa court, which you do. The current law does not require that the report those mistakes congress. But you do so on your own. And i assume you have no objection to us changing the law to mandate that nsa report both to the fisa court, the administration, as well as the congress for any of those instances that might occur . I personally have no objection, senator, to that. I think it makes sense. I would just add that both 2776 include executive orders and fisa court your so its all the possible areas we make across all our authorities. Only
Before 1978, surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes was conducted by the president without Court Approval, and the courts have consistently said that the president has authority to undertake such surveillance without Court Approval, where the target is a foreign intelligence threats. , but fisao abuses was created as a compromise between branches to enable that surveillance, but to involve article three courts in the review and approval, and congress, the oversight, creating the intelligence oversight i am going to have to be very tough. You have covered and a normas amount. Im very sure you can pick up any individual questions. Thank you thoma. Jameel . Limits start by addressing a degree of frustration by wainsteinthat mr. Said. When we were before the Supreme Court for clapper last year, the government really did repeatedly said that the assertion that the nsa was engaged in largescale surveillance of Americans International to medications under section 702 was speculative a
Best friends. And that. Was one of the most important managers at the Agency Responsible for planning and booking Advertising Campaigns for Global Airlines and other clients. His job also involved defining target groups for Consumer Item Producers developing Communications Content and promotional films he delivered sales of Three Billion Euros a year. Also negotiated discounts on advertising broadcast time and concealed the proceeds in a network of companies his employer was left. In the dark. The court later found him guilty on sixty eight counts of investment he was acquitted of charges in a civil court because he had made personal use of those profits. Maintained his
innocence and refused to cut a deal with prosecutors to begin and as a party. Of us. Would probably have come off far better if you had cooperated yet why didnt you. Because im convinced that im right that my version is correct. If someone can provide objective arguments to the contrary and then i take it back immediate