change which is a way of changing the topic from economi injustice, which they love to do . it is environmental places him. greg hit on something. do they actually believe in they promised $15 billion, all these companies, and they ve only given out $250 million. so is this all about emma putting their money where their mouth is quick. i think it s mostly here s the problem with virtue signaling. signaling your virtue becomes more important than being virtuous itself. you take a company which talks about the loss of intersection analogy, according to its ceo, yet does not pay its key picker which are right and in some places killed and maimed by their own colleagues, who are now seeking justice from unilever and they are denying that. that is one of the rules of how this game is actually played. i think it is even worse.
changing the topic from economi injustice, which they love to do . it is environmental places him. greg hit on something. do they actually believe in they promised $15 billion, all these companies, and they ve only given out $250 million. so is this all about emma putting their money where their mouth is quick. i think it s mostly here s the problem with virtue signaling. signaling your virtue becomes more important than being virtuous itself. you take a company which talks about the loss of intersection analogy, according to its ceo, yet does not pay its key picker which are right and in some places killed and maimed by their own colleagues, who are now seeking justice from unilever and they are denying that. that is one of the rules of how this game is actually played. i think it is even worse.