To four counts campaign financial violations. lev and igor played a role in helping rudy giuliani s efforts in obtaining damaging evidence on joe biden from ukrainian officials. lev s attorney, edward mcmahon, raised concerns from the judge that some evidence gathered in the case already by the federal government may be protected by attorney/client privilege and, more interestingly, possibly executive privilege. he said there is a lot of attorney/client and maybe even some executive privilege issues that are raised by the information that s already been seized. and then, of course, the issue of mr. giuliani, acting as the attorney for the president of the united states and in that capacity and i don t speak for anyone but mr. parnas, working for him. assistant u.s. attorney rebecca donalesky told the court, so to the extent he concerned about privilege, we are attuned to those concerns. we have a filter team in place.
community win and a celebration for us all. to learn more about the helen diller playground in dolores park, go to sfrecpark.org. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands on one nation, under god, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. i would like to call roll- call. [roll call] thank you very much. ladies and gentlemen, it will come to the august 29 at san francisco police commission meeting. this is our monthly meeting we held the last wednesday of the month in that community. we rotate these meetings through various district stations and tonight is the turn of captain tom in central station. i would like to welcome you. as the commissioner, this is one of the best parts of being on the commission, going out to the community once a month and the meeting at different communities and hearing from you what your concerns are. i see we are setting up with the interpreters, maybe i should slow down a b
lots that do not step there s that 7 storey building at lexington that shoots out, it s a historic maybe commissioner antonini has an idea. well, thank you, i don t know, i m very sensitive to what project sponsor s gone through and as was mentioned frequently, we have almost no buildings that were built between 5 and 9 units in the last five years and this is a 12 unit but it s getting close to where it isn t going to make any pencil out if we re going to have to take units, it sounds easy enough to add a floor off on the unit level and take a floor off, i m not sure if it works out to have the 8 2 bedroom unit and is the 4-1 bedroom units ts, i believe that s what we re looking at, we start losing one of our two bedroom units or something, i would be hesitant to do that even though it seems to make sense. i would probably make a motion just to approve the project with as designed right now with working with staff to try to incorporate some of the things that the
it is not something we encourage. we prefer people to get it, and it helped, because of the process had not been done right, 15 days might have been gone. in how the appeal because the permit did not get issued it helped the appeal because the permit did not get issued until july. if it had been done right this should have been issued around the start of march. technically, until it is actually issued, it is not a permit. exactly, it is a permit application but not a permit. the complete review had already occurred. it was ready to be issued in march. it had gone through the planning department, and the other departments were still going through the review with a different city agencies with other permits. thanks. ready? yes. the permit holders brief wrote it down, and i am in agreement with how they broke it down into three major components of the appeal, and i am in agreement that certain planning issues that have been raised on the environmental phase and
and 67.8 (a5), and 54956.9 (a) and 67.10 (d1). we are back in open session. the commission took no action with respect to item 13. item 14, approves. do i have a motion whether to approve the discussion? a motion not to disclose. second. all those in favor? that motion carries. other new business as a commission? if you will indulge me just for a moment, earlier today, we heard about the southeast community facility in the city college. i thought it was a little interesting that all of the other facilities of city college have an admissions desk. i was hoping we could get somebody on staff to check into that and figure out why there is not an emissions desk at the southeast facility. i believe there is. i will check, but i believe there is one. that stuck out to me. it may not be as obvious as in some other places, but i will check. any other new business? seeing none, we are adjourned. thank you. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of a