Meetings of the year end deadline for the direct cost to us. Chinas escort the dtp doctor today to show you what i expected. Chinas biggest overseas mining deals. What sort of snack afterwards like five point eight billion us dollars. I welcomed it. The nt. First up a new phrase is beginning in the search for missing flights and takes three seventeen. Australias joint Agency Coordination center which accc says a distance this issue has been taken to end the use of the thai cooking i like a top which looks for black box signals i was a vehicle would now be used to look for the plane at depths of up to four thousand five hundred meet us the child crying in the employment of the underwater vehicle it has a twenty four twenty four hour cycle. Scion. We anticipate us this morning and met this evening. It will then be recovered. And with the collection of dots of analysis and so on. It will be ready to be deployed if everything goes according to plan exactly twenty four ounce for the first d
First of all, i do want to thank supervisor avalos for introducing this legislation. For the most part it is something that i actually do agree with. Like supervisor wiener said, would love for the board to support unanimously at the end of the day. But we all know San Francisco is a city that embraces people from all walks of life and certainly as a product of immigrant parents myself, i truly embrace the diversity of our residents. However, i do believe that there is a fine line and a very important distinction between being a sanctuary city and a safe haven for serious and or violent activity and whether you are boo. [gavel] if i can just finish. Whether you are a citizen or undocumented immigrant, i think many of us can all agree we have no tolerance for serious or Violent Crimes in our community. And again, we as citizens as well are held to very high standards. And like supervisor avalos, i do represent a district made up of many immigrants and many of whom which also care very m
Continued dialogue with the advocate community, and also with law enforcement. And i think that we know that supervisor avalos has engaged our district attorney, but i think that they have some legitimate concerns that have been raised. But i appreciate the spirit in which this is being done. The last thing that i would add is that i do think it is possible for us to have a unanimous vote and we can do that today by simply voting it as is. [cheering and applauding] supervisor avalos. Thank you, colleagues, for all your comments. Im not sure we actually can vote on it today, so, it looks like it can be next week. And i know where we got to today was through a lot of close discussion and negotiations in the morning and there are many amendments that came forward that just arent going to be ready to be written into form that we can actually vote on today. So, thats why were going to be not be able to vote until tomorrow. But i do want to caution against, you know, adding other elements to
Concept of selfdefense. It is a reference known as certain laws and he said it was time to question those laws before the first 45 minutes, your views on selfdefense laws. The attorney general is questioning those type of loss. Here is how you can give your comments this morning you can also join us on social media you can also send us email. Lets take a look at the speech as far as the headlines of the papers dealt with it. This is the wall street journal in the pages of the Washington Post said as and in the Washington Times was made in orlando, florida. Attorney general eric holder referring to expanded selfdefense laws. [video clip] examine laws to that expand the ideas of self defense. [applause] these laws try to fix something that was never broken. There has always been a Legal Defense for using deadly force if, and the if it is important, if no safe retreat is available. We must examine laws that take this further by eliminating the common sense that people who feel threatened
Im in. Depends on your definition of attach the reforms of you get into what those words really mean, and i began to say that is not reform. There is nothing in the plan that asks everyone to pay there is nothing that ask the wealthy to be part of the solution. What we have here is a disagreement as to the basic problem. We are still hearing talk about tax on the wealthy. We just got some tax on the wealthy. It will pay for about a week of running the federal government. If we confiscated everyones income that make over 250,000 north, it pays for one year of the deficit. I am just saying, if we brought it down to what the president wanted to bring it down to. The medicare situation, the Social Security situation, medicaid, the Congressional Budget Office and everybody taking a look at it basically said it is not sustainable. The trajectory, there is no way around it. It was hit on just a minute ago, when someone said was concern, it cannot do that without taxing the middle class. Exact