of working and middle-class families across the country. but republican special interest and elected officials sued to the relief and i am completely confident my plan is legal. but right now it is on hold because of these lawsuits, but it is not fair to ask it tens of millions of borrowers eligible for relief to resume their student debt payments while the courts consider the lawsuit. for that reason the secretary of education s extending paws on student loan payments while we seek relief from the courts. spin on the plan is legal, but nancy pelosi seems to disagree, take a listen. people think that the president of the united states has the power for debt forgiveness. he does not. he can postpone, he can delay, but he does not have that power. that is not even a discussion, not everybody realizes that. and the eighth circuit agrees with nancy pelosi, power of the
same time, we just listen to you president trump and listed off a lot of accomplishments that he feels went very well this year, tax reform at the top of the list. that is something that democrats have argued could potentially hurt republicans, yet they have embraced that part of their governments. they are very proud of tax reform. your thoughts on that issue and if it will be used on democrats to try to take out republicans? i think mouth is going to be the problem. 80% of the benefit goes to the wealthiest 1%. over ten years by the time that it takes place, 53% of working americans will actually see their taxes increased. at the same time that goldman sachs is getting it tens of billions of dollars and massive it tax cut. you look at at some of these big banks, they are maybe passing something like 2% or less of the benefit of the tax cut to their
tucker: it disables anything electronic. are we sure this could happen? we re sure it could happen, it probably wouldn t disable everything but it would disable enough in our highly connected technological civilization to cause chaos that could cause tens of millions of americans to die before it s sorted out. tucker: tens of millions? tens of millions. if you have no electric power for six months to a year, you have no food delivery, you have no gasoline, you have no water, you think about that, it s pretty bad. tucker: you re saying it tens of millions could die without being killed by the explosion itself. just because of living in electricity free society. yes, exactly, the explosion would hurt everybody. but the results of this would
1800s. tucker: it disables anything electronic. are we sure this could happen? we re sure it could happen, it probably wouldn t disable everything but it would disable enough in our highly connected technological civilization to cause chaos that could cause tens of millions of americans to die before it s sorted out. tucker: tens of millions? tens of millions. if you have no electric power for six months to a year, you have no food delivery, you have no gasoline, you have no water, you think about that, it s pretty bad. tucker: you re saying it tens of millions could die without being killed by the explosion itself. just because of living in electricity free society. yes, exactly, the explosion would hurt everybody.
1800s. tucker: it disables anything electronic. are we sure this could happen? we re sure it could happen, it probably wouldn t disable everything but it would disable enough in our highly connected technological civilization to cause chaos that could cause tens of millions of americans to die before it s sorted out. tucker: tens of millions? tens of millions. if you have no electric power for six months to a year, you have no food delivery, you have no gasoline, you have no water, you think about that, it s pretty bad. tucker: you re saying it tens of millions could die without being killed by the explosion itself. just because of living in electricity free society. yes, exactly, the explosion would hurt everybody.