Very clear that the states had participated in a be bell i don t know and insurrection. it was a civil war since then, of course, congress and other conservatives within congress at the time debated whether or not his ability remained in place or was there an am necessity of sort. that s in the law review article coming out from the university of pennsylvania. i do think at this point whether or not there s a challenge by donald trump for being left off of the ballot or put on and then challenged by the people, in the end it s going to the u.s. supreme court. wow, a lot of uncharted waters here. gloria browne-marshall, appreciate you joining us. be sure to check out blo gloria s book she took justice. make sure to join anderson keerp as he breaks down the details of the criminal indictment in georgia. the whole story with anderson
The SPLC has faced a long history of allegations of discrimination while it simultaneously purports to be a "catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond."
Facing hardships and complications before and learned how to overcome them. so i think it is going to be a court in which we have a lot of controversy, but we also have a sense of hope that things are changing, and the fact she ascended to the high court, but at the same time, there is going to be a push backwards. two steps forward is always going to bring a backlash. we re looking at the backlash. i know, i know, i m sure, i m hopeful that we will have hope in the future for a better day. right now it is rather dismal, because of the court, but i think the assent of justice jackson and the idea that so many people believe in the country will take us to a better day when it comes to our equal rights under law, but right now, it is time for litigation, legislation and protests to make these social justice dreams a reality. gloria browne-marshall, we
Heller and the mcdonnell decision, and use it to expand later to go to those issues, why should it be a certain age? why is it the limit should be automatic weapons as opposed to another type of weapon? so, i think this is just a foothold to expand second amendment rights even going further in the future. heller, relevant to the current conversation, because that was a d.c. handgun law struck down by the supreme court. gloria browne-marshall, i m sure we ll have you back as the decisions come down. thank you. is russia preparing to once again meddle in the u.s. elections, midterm elections coming up? it is a possible national security officials are watching closely. up next, the challenges of keeping the ballot box safe from foreign interference. gether, and find the answer that wasas right under their nose. or. his nose.
The draft, the history of tradition of this, the rights in this country, we re talking about 1787 when the constitution was drafted. what were the positions and rights and traditions for african-americans, for immigrants, for women during that time period. what traditions and rights are we looking at? what rights do we have now that are not clearly articulated in the constitution that we want to enjoy and how does this open us all up to having our rights away, we can say butchered, the supreme court is deciding, cherry picking the constitution to decide what rights we re supposed to enjoy, what rights we re not supposed to have based on the conservative agenda. it s a great point. things like same-sex marriage or even interracial marriage, not explicitly guaranteed in the constitution. gloria browne-marshall, thank you so much for joining us. we are following breaking developments, sad ones out of ukraine. new fighting at that azovstal steel plant in mariupol as well