religious belief. what is religious belief is prevents at his own privately owned orchard and therefore a federal judge issues a permanent injunction, not having this in court every single year. this is a soundbite from the farmer himself what he says is going on here. it is our faith that made us a target of government discrimination. the government shouldn t treat some people worse than others simply because they thoughts or ideas. have to disagree immensely. it is becoming a forefront on cities. cities are taking a stand on nondiscriminatory ordinances. east lansing is the first city in the united states to pass a nondescript nation ordinance protecting the lgbt q community and this is a trend, the way we are going. it doesn t mean it is a war on christianity or any other
thank you, barry. christina, day with us because we re going to meet another person that beckett is defending. i say, in a free country, people ought to have the right to discriminate. government must not. the worse of american racism and homophobia slavery, segregation enforced by jim crow, state bans on interracial marriage, anti-sodomy laws and so forth was government discrimination. and that s wrong. but private actions are different. if i start a business, with my own money, i ought to be allowed to serve only libertarians or people who wear blue shirts, whatever. it s my business. my customers have choices. if i m racist or anti-gay free market competition will punish me. enough people will boycott my business and i ll lose money. punishment from market competition is enough. more and more oppressive law is not needed here. in private life we don t need
pizza to a wedding. so first, let me give my 2 cents, i say in a free country that people should have the right to discriminate. government must not come at the worst of american racism and homophobia and slavery and segregation state bands anti-sodomy laws with government discrimination and it was right for the federal government to intervene and if i start a business with my own money i should be able to serve only libertarians are people aware of loose shirts and my customers have this free-market competition and enough people will boycott the business and i will lose money. punishment from market competition is enough. more and more oppressive law is not needed here and so look out
if the intent is to mirror what the federal intend is than draw the law that way. you make it clear, language that protects every citizen in that state from discrimination. when you can t answer that question fundamentally you are on a slippery slope with the broader public. that s what this law does. it protects every citizen in indiana from government discrimination. it s because the government cannot course exercising free expression of religion it is the same standard as 31 other states. no it is not. dan says it s discrimination. it strikes me that all of the businesses currently boycotting indiana say they want to run
you make it very clear by adding to your state constitution or otherwise language that protects every citizen in that state from discrimination. when you can t answer that question fundamentally, that s when you get on the slippery slope and have a real problem with the broader public. ryan go ahead. sure. that s exactly what this law does. this law protects every citizen in the state of indiana from government discrimination. it says the government cannot coerce anyone s free exercise of religion unless it s doing it in a least restrictive way possible. ryan is using the definition it s the same legal standard as 31 other states. no it is not. it strikes me that all of the businesses currently boycotting indiana says they want to run their business in accordance with their values. why is it that the 70-year-old