Latest Breaking News On - Harvard law review - Page 9 : vimarsana.com

Polyamory the 'next sexual revolution'? It's been here for years

On Jan. 23, I posted on X, "Five days ago @MattWalshBlog wrote, 'This is now the fourth article in a major media publication in the span of one week pushing "polyamory."' Today, the @WSJ noted that 'polyamory is having a moment.' Perhaps this article that I wrote in 2012, called, 'The Next Sexual Revolution Has…

Khiara M. Bridges Talks Race, Law, and Reproductive Rights at UC Santa Barbara

Opinion | How 'Killers of the Flower Moon' Presses Up Against the Limits of Empathy

The movie offers clues about how a reckoning with American colonialism must begin.

Thiru Vignarajah announces second bid for Baltimore mayor, fourth run for office

The addition of Vignarajah sets up a similar field as 2020, when Brandon Scott received 29.6% of the vote and defeated Dixon and Vignarajah.

Jenny Martínez for Harvard President: A Free Speech Leader for a Polarized Era | Opinion

Jenny Martínez for Harvard President: A Free Speech Leader for a Polarized Era | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson

Only One University Adopts Leading Antisemitism Definition 2023, New Report Says

Opinion | Will The Supreme Court Upend How Government Works?

The justices should leave it to federal agencies to resolve ambiguities Congress creates when it writes laws those agencies enforce.

Of Course Trump Won Iowa - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

I am absolutely, incredibly, utterly amazed that political pundits are absolutely, incredibly, utterly amazed that President Donald Trump won Iowa.

Morning Glory: A fantasy draft for Trump's second term

Radio host Hugh Hewitt argues former President Trump should release a list of potential appointees for his second term to jump-start fundraising and media outreach.

Living Inside a Psyop | Online Only | n+1

The university’s initial statements had acknowledged that there was in fact a war happening in the Middle East and that members of our community had families and friends who had been killed or were living in extreme danger. This latest statement, on the other hand, sought to ban the chanting of words in a time of war without mentioning the war itself.