don t touch that. nobody wants anything else touched. they are saying go over the cliff, but the public is not okay with that. the public is wary and concerned about this as it should be. we going to get where do we think. do we think they do another counteroffer? where do we feel like we stand right now at 9:50 in the morning? i have a piece about paul ryan and there is dissension. if you look at who is signing the boehner counteroffers, you have kantor, mckarthy and paul ryan on board with speaker boehner. that reflects his strength. boehner will condition to stand strong as long as he has their support. whatever deal he cuts, he will have 80 or 90. at the end of the day, yeah. if he agrees to it. that s the thing. you can imagine there will be a lot of pull from a lot of different sides on this within the condition conference. some of these guys are behind
huffington post kantor is on board as long as one thing is stripped from the bill, a key protection for native american women. cantor is refusing to accept any added protections for native american women that would give expanded jurisdiction to tribes and is pressuring democrats to concede on that front. in the meantime, the crew over at fox news is giving advice on women can protect themselves against violence. get a gun. fox that suggestion off and instead placed blame on victims. it skirts the issue. women are victims of violence all the time. should have guns. or make better decisions. guns just solve everything. tonight in our survey, will republicans publish speaker boehner for trying to work with the president? 87% say yes. coming up, supreme court announced it will hear its first same-sex marriage cases. jonathan turley on what the
want those protections removed. i think the talks are serious but the prospects dim. the senate democratic leadership aide told the hill newspaper. house republicans don t seem to be learning the lessons of the campaign and election. meanwhile, sources tell the huffington post kantor is on board as long as one thing is stripped from the bill, a key protection for native american women. cantor is refusing to accept any added protections for native american women that would give expanded jurisdiction to tribes and is pressuring democrats to concede on that front. in the meantime, the crew over at fox news is giving advice on women can protect themselves against violence. get a gun. fox news contributor dana perino
again. that was from 2011, not this year. what a difference a year makes. that was house majority leader eric cantor muscle flexing on the house floor. but that was a year ago. amid the heated debt deal negotiations. back then, he and his tea party affiliated obstructionist policies had a very strong voice. leader kantor had been a mentor figure to many of the freshman gop house members voted in during the 2010 midterms and they were the group speaker boehner could not get in line to work towards a compromise last year. this week, there was no seat at the table for mr. cantor. are the power politics of 2012 different enough to stave off this dire fiscal future? back to the panel. so eric s gone. he s not at the table this time, daniel. well, but the situation is that president obama didn t win a monarchy. he won the presidency. this is still a republic.
spending. he kind of sounded like the opposite. elections do have consequences. as grover knows only too well. i figure if he can say poopy head i can bring a stuffed animal to represent him on set. okay, two things i want to talk about here. one is what happens to policy making when someone who is unelected is able to get folks to sign a pledge and they are held to that pledge in the process of politics? is this just for the republican party just bad politics to let an unelected leader have this much power? i don t think so. i think this pledge is a reflection of the ideology that stands behind this. this isn t about grover. this is about the ideas still and the principles. it is about grover. it s about the fact that he would put massive resources to primary anybody who didn t sign this pledge. but at the end of the day, this is about the government drawing more resources from the private sector and leaving less moneyton create and generate jobs and prosperity and growth.