voters are moving towards republicans. and even among black voters, donald trump improved a percentage of black voters of the presidential level from 8% to 12% from 2016 to 2020. that is a 50% improvement. that is going in the wrong direction. why? the economy, crime, school choice. urban parents one school choice, particularly among black parents. they know they are getting the worst teachers come the worse. krantz, and the worse outcomes. i ran for governor as you know and prepend them, 75% of black boys in california could not read and state levels of proficiency in the math score was even worse. half of all third-graders in our government schools cannot read at state levels of proficiency. and again, math scores are even worse. so school choice, which was used in virginia, republicans are gaining ground among so-called voters of color and the democrats are scared sleepless and they should be. jesse: the democrats
statement about all of the things that general information cannot see. and that s why an application ought to, as you say, have an interview, have an essay. i really want to be clear, we re not displacing those things. that would be crazy. is it the role, though, of the college board to be involved in this issue? don t the applications already afford opportunity for students to tell their story? see, my real problem is that in the end, and i recognize it might not be student specific, but it s still a numerical value that will be looked at in the context of their verbal and math score. what s cool is the application process you that care about remain s intact. there will be that general back ground. it will be all of the information the student provide that is not being changed about all of the individual information you care about. let s talk about why you might do that, why it might be decent to do that. right now, colleges get school profiles from schools so they try to get a se
that sentencing won t happen until next month, but this recommendation from prosecutors that in the virginia case alone he should be looking at 19 to 24 years, does that mean we should expect he will get 19 to 24 years? you know, that s the sentencing guidelines. it s sort of a starting point where judges are supposed to look to calculate a sentence. it s a very numerical score. all these kinds of things. you come up with kind of a math score and you go to a table and that s where you get that range of 19 to 24. then the judge is allowed to consider mitigating factors and aggravating factors to decide whether the sentence should be a little bit below that or a little bit above that. based on this filing, they can t think of any mitigating factors, there are aggravating factors for someone who is very wealthy, highly educated and yet based solely on greed decides to commit these crimes. the defense will file something certainly that tries to point out some mitigating factors, but i ca
that s sentencing guidelines and a starting point where judges are supposed to look to crack rate calculate a sentence. you mentioned things that go into that sophisticated means and leadership and all these things and come up with a math score and go to a table and that s where you get the range of 19 to 24 and the judge is allowed to consider mitigating and aggravating factors to see if the sentence should be above that or below. they can t think of any mitigating factors. there are aggravating factors for someone that is very wealthy and highly educated and yet, based solely on greed decides to commit crimes. the defense will file something certainly that tries to point out mitigating factors. if you can stick with us, there is one other matter i wanted to ask you about raised by congress. two more lawyers associated with the president being accused by
years? you know, that s the sentencing guidelines. it s sort of a starting point where judges are supposed to look to calculate a sentence. it s a very numerical score. all these kinds of things. you come up with kind of a math score and you go to a table and that s where you get that range of 19 to 24. then the judge is allowed to consider mig gating factors and aggravating factors to decide whether the sentence should be a little bit below that or a little bit above that. based on this filing, they can t think of any mitigating factors, there are aggravating factors for someone who is very wealthy, highly educated and yet based solely on greed decides to commit these crimes. the defense will file something certainly that tries to point out some mitigating factors, but i can t imagine they re going to say things that convince this judge to go stafrm below that range. wow. barb, if you can stick with us, there is one other matter i wanted to ask you about, actually raised by congre