agricultural product again. they are starting to go with the beef and all the different things, pork. very big on pork if you look an see. they are starting very heavy to buy our ag again. they should want to make a deal. the question is do we want to make a deal. if usmca end of nafta. you know how i feel about nafta. worst trade deal ever made. although i also happen to think world trade organization was not one of the greats. not one of the greats. that was the creation of china, which went like a rocket ship from the day they signed. it was terrible. but, we are going to find out. that s going to be a very interesting question. with nannies and chuck and all of these people focusing on the witch-hunt because they can t beat us at the ballot. they can t beat us at the
ballot. and they are not going to win the presidential. we are having great polls. we have internal polls, ohio, iowa, pennsylvania is looking good. north carolina. we just won two races that a lot of people
that a businessman would have knowledge is limited in any when he is about to sign a transaction. but if you go after his integrity, right, if you go check. and by that he clearly meant after his public service, if you go after his military record, that president trump was you re done. thinking about or had in front but chuck, isn t there a high stakes problem with that, for of him the possibility of providing security assistance to trump and the republicans to say, because then the next question is, okay, who does know ukraine. it was similar to writing a check to someone who you re what trump said? bolton and trump. about to send. he used that analogy very and they don t want those folks to come before congress. i absolutely agree. i m saying if there is a path to clearly to indicate that this try and point out that he has limited knowledge, that s the would be this would require path and it s a narrow one. something. if that person owed him does it ultimately work? no, it do
expired. i d like to have that unanimous consent mr. quigley, you re recognized, mr. quigley, you re recognized. thank you. madam ambassador, it s like a hallmark movie. you ended up at georgetown, this is all okay. [ laughter ] it wasn t your preference seven, eight months ago, correct? no, it was not. it wasn t your preference to be the victim of a cemetery campaign, was it? no. it wasn t your preference to be defamed by the president of the united states including today, was it? no. it wasn t your preference to be ousted at seemingly the pinnacle of your career, was it? no. you wanted to finish your extended tour, correct? i did. what did you want to do after that? did you know? i wasn t sure. there s nothing wrong with georgetown. it s a fine place, right? it s a wonderful place. but it s your own choice at the end of the distinguished career after all that. it s not the end of a hallmark movie. it s the end of a really bad reality tv show bro
of law and our fierce constitutional patriotism. now, it looked like president trump might get away with his ukraine shakedown. after all most americans didn t know anything about it and the few who learned of it would be too afraid, too intimidated to cross the most powerful man on earth. president trump could rest easy. but if donald trump misjudged the american character, the framers of our constitution did not. i count 17 honorable public servants who came forward to testify over the intimidation and disparagement of the president. is that right, mr. goldman? yes. there was 17. and i counted dozen career state department and national security officials who served republican and democratic presidents alike over decades who came to testify. in fact, four of president trump s own national security council staffers, hill, vindman, morrison and maguire came
forward to report trump s scheme to nsc lawyers as soon as they learned of it, didn t they mr. goldman. morrison and vindm
ambitions. our self-respect. our love of freedom and the rule of law. our fierce constitutional patriotism. now, it looked like president trump might get might get away with his ukraine shakedown. after all, most americans didn t know anything about it. and the few who learned of it would be too afraid, too intimidated to cross the most powerful man on earth. fr president trump could rest easy. but if donald trump misjudged the american character, the framers of our constitution did not. i count 17 honorable public servants who came forward to testify over the intimidation and disparagement of the president. is that right, mr. goldman? yes, there were 17. and i count a dozen career state department and national security officials who served republican and democratic presidents alike, over decades, who came to testify. in fact, four of president trump s own national security council s staffers, hill,
vindman, morrison, and mcguyer, came forward to report trump s scheme to nsc l
and i thought the threat to our nation was well articulated earlier today by professor feldman when you said, if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy, we live in a monarchy or we live under a districtatorship. my view is if people cannot depend on the fairness of our elections, then what people are calling divisive today will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. after the events of ukraine unfolded, the president claimed that the reason he requested an investigation into his political opponents and withheld desperately needed military aid for ukraine was supposedly because he was worried about corruption. however, contrary to president s statements, various witnesses, including vice president pence s special adviser jennifer williams, testified that the president s request was political. take a listen. i found the july 25th phone call unusual because in contrast to other presidenti
figures constitutional patriotism. it look like president trump might get away. most americans didn t know anything about it in the few who knew of it would be too afraid, too intimidated to cross the most powerful man on earth. president trump could rest easy. but if donald trump misjudged the american character, the framers of our constitution did not. i account for 17 honorable public servants who came forward to testify over the intimidation and disparagement of the president. is that right, mr. goldman? yes, there were 17. i counted 17,000 officials who served republican and democratic presidents alike who came to testify. in fact, four of president trump s own national security staffers came forward
to report trump s scheme to nsc lawyers as soon as they learned about it. didn t they can make mr. goldman? morrison and vindman went to the lawyers. yes. that move me a lot. my father was a staffer on the national security council under president kennedy and he said the mo
that we find ourselves in. and i thought the threat to our nation was well-articulated earlier today by professor feldman. when you said if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy. we live in a monarchy or we live under a dictatorship. my view is that if people cannot depend on the fairness of our elections, then what people are calling divisive today will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. after the events of ukraine unfolded, the president claimed that the reason he requested an investigation into his political opponents and withheld desperately needed military aid for ukraine was supposedly because he was worried about corruption. however, contrary to the president s statements, various witnesses, including vice president pence s special advisor jennifer williams,
testified that the president s request was political. take a listen. i found the july 25th phone call unusual because
powers of his high office, president trump solicited the interference of a foreign government, ukraine, in the 2020 united states presidential election. he did so through a scheme or course of conduct that soliciting the government of ukraine, don t harm the election prospects of a political opponent. president trump also sought to pressure the government of ukraine to take the steps by conditioning a conditional united states government acts of significant value to ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. president trump engaged in this scheme for corrupt purposes and pursuit of personal political benefit. in so doing, president trump used the powers of the presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the united states and undermined the integrity of the united states democratic process. he thus ignored and injured the
interests of the nation. president trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct through the following means. one, president
Misrepresented your knowledge about the disappearance of the victim. is that correct? yes, sir. by then, forensics left little doubt who would actually pull the trigger. at jakes autopsy, they found the slug that killed him. the bullet was still there. and we were able to match it to the gun. deb s gun. a ladysmith and wesson revolver. they found it under debs bed. with deb s dna on the handle. you certainly do have the right to make a statement. in may of 2019, four years after she killed her son. deb pleaded to second degree murder. even then, deb maintained, she alone did the crime and the cover-up. but my daughter stephanie jackson, in no way knowingly, had anything to do with jake s death or subsequent cover-up. she was sentenced to 40 years. i would like to start out by saying thank you. for the opportunity to speak.