things that described what had gone on that put all of it in context. and i thought that needed to be out. it was it was not good behavior for a president, it was unbecoming of a white house, so, i wanted to get that out. cipollone, on the other hand, from what i can see, wants to tell us as little as he possibly can and not look like he s an obstructionist. so he s walking a fine line of trying to not offend his potential clients down the road, which i don t know how you do. i would think that helping the democracy would be the best thing he could do and what would help democracy most is to explain this behavior in great detail. norm, separate but related to the committee investigation, the fulton county d.a. in georgia said today she would not rule out a subpoena for the former president in her investigation. do you think he could get a subpoena squashed?
and russia is a country that they are next door to. he did want to maintain a bit of neutrality, even as the ambassador said, they ve been taking steps in the direction, they do a lot with nato, they do a lot with nato militaries. but, the reality is, for them, nato is the ultimate insurance policy. nobody can look at vladimir putin and not wonder where is he going to go next. once they are member of nato, they have that are in clad article five to calm and offense. if russia used an inch in the finish territory, united states and nato are committed to bear defense. that s the insurance policy that they re looking for, watching what s happening in ukraine right now. general, republican senator, rand paul, delaying approval of an additional 40 billion dollars in aid to ukraine until next week. when you think about that? it s astonishing. he s an obstructionist. he s drawing attention to himself.
watching what s happening in ukraine right now. general, republican senator, rand paul, delaying approval of an additional 40 billion dollars in aid to ukraine until next week. when you think about that? it s astonishing. he s an obstructionist. he s drawing attention to himself. he s a very erratic political leader. his own caucus widely supports moving his s bill through. you can delay for a week or so, and then it will pass. and article one of the constitution deals with the congress, the most important of the three branches of government. it barely functions because of this warfare. primarily, pryor merrily because of the republicans there is a bipartisan consensus at national security risk are significantly at risk, if ukraine goes under to russian aggression. rand paul is operating against
this is where a lot of these crappy i was about to swear. this is where these bubble up at the state level. the democrats get a lot of criticism on congress, but i think we have to keep reminding people why it s so important because of the obstructionist gop who don t have ideas but don t want to see president biden accomplish anything. as frustrated as we are with joe manchin and kyrsten sinema, they deserve all that smoke, let me just say, i think we have to keep that equal amount of frustration and disdain towards the republican party who have completely aligned themselves with donald trump in favor over their constituents and the constituents needs. in a way, right. because a lot of the constituents support the nonsense they re doing. that brings us to what is an upcoming anniversary in five days now yeah. five days it s the one year
accomplishments, as of course a president would. but refused to give any ground on except on testing, perhaps, how they could have gotten control of testing for covid. but refused to give any ground on anything else. and i think what we really heard today was kind of a road test of what he intends to talk about in the midterm elections. and that is republican obstruction. and he said, ask the republicans what they re for. and it s clear to me that what he was saying is that republicans, even during the obama administration of course, david can speak to this better than i can. he said, republicans during the obama administration were not as obstructist as this. you can ask the question, since he was in the obama administration, why didn t he know that this is eight years later and of course they were more obstructionist because of donald trump?