we need an answer. we need the black box, the fly data recorder. couldn t agree more. michael kay, jim tillman, great to have you here to talk through this. we talked about this data deleted from the pilot simulator, ahead in this hour, we are going to take a look at that. we have had our martin savidge up in toronto looking at this. we will tell you who killed that information out, and why. certainly got the fbi s attention. with my geico app. vin # is up to the loaded. ok well then jerry here will take you through all of the features then. why don t weeeeeeeeeeee go out to the car. ok, i ll just be outside. ok, yeah. his dad is my boss. yeah. vin scanning to add a car. just a tap away on the geico app.
u.s. officials are not commenting on the accuracy of the claim. the flight turned westward was programmed in the computer reenforcing the theory that the jet was redirected by the pilots or one or more individuals with flying experience. the aircraft was scheduled to fly to/beijing. it was reported in new york times today. it could be speculation. it is once you are in the aircraft, anything it possible. the malaysia media reported that a half dozen remote landing strips were found on the 53-year-old pilot simulator. also today malaysia opposition leader confirmed that he is related to the 53 year old pilot adding weight to the theory that he may have had a political motive for diverting the flight.
mitchell casado, a pilot trainer who has worked in a triple 7 pilot simulator and hans weber. there are lots of theories out there, hans. one that many believe is that this plane is somewhere probably on the bottom of the ocean. if so, why not debris field? can this happen without a debris field? no, it cannot happen without a debris field. there is always a debris field. there are many items on an airplane that are buoyant, sea cushions, et cetera, usually, there are air pockets in stabilizers. remember, the air france 447 had the vertical stabilizer float around in the ocean. if you re interested, i could offer one theory. i read today, a friend of mine in england sent me a page from an english paper. i think was called the daily telegraph or just the
puts that back on the table. you have the satellite and tracking the plane in the air for more than seven hours and causing the search crews to be refocused. that technology is not used for tracking planes. how dependable is this? that technology, the satellite is out of space and pings with the plane. the airplane responds to those ping. it s almost as if the satellite is saying are you there? the plane responds yes, i m here. authorities are saying they are confident that this is the plane they tracked in the air for more than seven hours after take off because the signal the satellite is picking up has a unique code that only that plane would have. it s almost impossible to compete. it is it. we are all learn learning about aviation together. thank you so much. coming up, we will take you inside the cockpit and talk to a trainer about the pilot
who has worked in a triple 7 pilot simulator, and, hans, to you first. there are lots of theories out there, hans. one that many believe is that this plane is somewhere probably on the bottom of the ocean. if so, why not debris field? can this happen without a debris field? no, it cannot happen without a debris field. there is always a debris field. there are many items on an airplane that are buoyant, sea cushions, et cetera, usually, there are air pockets in stabilizers. remember, the air france 447 had the vertical stabilizer float around in the ocean. if you re interested, i could offer one theory. i read today a friend of mine in england sent me a page from an english paper. i m not familiar with it. i think it was called the daily telegraph or just the telegraph. according to which this past week, some guy in british custody who used to be an al qaeda operator in pakistan told a court that he