continuing to help train. we have seen the damage isil can do and bringing down the russian airliner and bombing and slaughterings. and the isil inspired attacks you ve seen here. can you explain why the french did not invoke article five of nato and why isn t nato the answer to the question on how to defeat isil? all 28 members of nato have been involved in the international coalition against isil. the french asked for particular help under the european article because they wanted help to back fill on some of the european missions already being organized in africa in western and central
for is not a back door but a front door that when you show up with a court order or search warrant you ve gone through an entire process to prove your probable cause that maybe something dangerous happened there. aside from terrorism child exploration, kidnapping, criminal gang plot to commit murders from prison. with that in mind, how difficult is it to intercept these isis inspired attacks? in other words, maybe there was no direct order coming from overseas. you had two people radicalized and inspired by isis. how can you catch that? multiple ways.
it s one example across the board. up next, everyone seems to agree air strikes alone won t defeat isis. what s the u.k. s strategy? redid you say 97?97! yes. you know, that reminds me of geico s 97% customer satisfaction rating. 97%? helped by geico s fast and friendly claims service. huh. oh yeah, baby. geico s as fast and friendly as it gets. woo! geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more.
in our parliament. it makes no sense to be attacking isil on one side of an artificial line and not the other when isil doesn t recognize the boarder. this is one campaign. particularly, its headquarterers. it is these attacks being inspired, directed, organized and financed. attacks in western europe and the murders we saw recently on the streets of paris. go ahead, john. sir, could you talk about the potential roll for russia in this on going struggle? well, russia has intervened in this civil war on syria and been attacking the forces, the moderate forces opposed to the dicta
strength. it s not a projection of policy. you look inside this poll and believe donald trump is the best to handle terrorism and isis. we haven t heard anything specific but he gives off strength. so we ve heard nothing specific from him and yet the president gave an address that was very specific in terms of what we were doing and we all were like is that necessarily fair? what is it that we are not doing that we should be doing right now? who can articulate that for us? the problem is, richard angle said the president presented four things. three of them we were already doing. right. that s his point. three of the things that the president said we needed to do to move forward had already been seen as object failures.