intra-democratic fight that is so not needed, and so unnecessary at a time when they feel talk to people on both sides of this issue that they feel that they absolutely need to have a united front. and there are so many layers, i am told, to this, it s it s personal. it is political when it comes to, um, personal ambitions, i should say. and there is just frustration on the part of a lot of people in and and around stacey able rams world that the president didn t do that kind of speech much earlier but it just changes the subject of what we are talking about as opposed to the fact that it is republicans who are putting democrats in the position of having to argue about whether to change process rules in the senate, as opposed to the substance of voting rights. well, van, you know, people stop attending speeches or
to what we re talking about, as opposed to the fact that it is republicans who are putting democrats in the position of having to argue about whether to change process rules in the senate as opposed to the substance of voting rights. well, van, people stop attending speeches or distance themselves from a president or others when they feel that person is weak or that they have a separate agenda. whatever the reason, she wasn t there. what signal, do you think, it sends? what s been the mistake here? what are you hearing from people who there s certainly a lot of folks on the left who believe the president hasn t done enough. well, i think that, first of all, this is about a grassroots movement that is tired. don t forget, african american voters in georgia, in particular, put the country on their backs and carried this country out of a real crisis in the 2020 election. and have not stopped fighting.
You’ll succeed in direct proportion to your willingness to focus and concentrate on your task that is to make yourself a master in your craft and in your specific field of selling.
with as a matter of policy. but in every case, the job of the justice department is to make the best judgment it can as to what the law requires. that strikes me as a crystal clear explanation, barb, but what s your take on what you just heard? i think that goes to his entire theme of his administration so far about this idea of adherence to the rule of law being nonpartisan, being independent. for example, i think some people were surprised when doj took the position of fighting back against the state of california which has banned the federal government with contracting with private prisons. it doesn t mean that doj or merrick garland favor private prisons. i bet if you asked them individually how they feel about it, they would say it s a terrible policy. but it s a right for the federal government to enter into contracts. so these kinds of process rules