by her standards she might as well be a brook giving a reach around to hitler in a bubble bath. [applause] [applause] what he think about this? what he think why she sang this question mike is she stupid? guy: i just find it so boring. it so my first presidential vote wasn t 2004 for president bush. greg: how did you go back then? guy: fraud. [laughs] i painted on a beard. greg: did you get on some of the shoulders? in a trench coat? guy: put on those [bleep] [bleep]. [cheers and applause] [applause] greg: i could hear you say those put on those [bleep] [bleep]. guy: i was seven and i was omitted. they called george bush hitler a lot and i we have donald trump and his hitler and were already
racist. emily: oh, joe, that same talking point. joe: is the show good? that is all i care about. is the movie good question mike that s all i care about. can you imagine the show around when the greatest comedy and intelligent history seinfeld, oh, no all white cast and don t get me started on friends, six straight white people? and there is no representation of african americans or hispanics or anybody el else, anybody from the community. that is the thing. we base everything on race. and we look through the prism. i just care for sure was good. emily: martha, the argument is for talking fans and the dragon, house of dragons, they are very, very like every single deep filmic detail has to be like the original pier the point is when these fans raised questions about authenticity or the likeness that some of them
europe is going to tip the scales. earlier tonight he give a very bizarre speech about a new world order. pay attention to this one. now is a time where things are shifting. there s going to be a new world order and we ve got to unite the rest the world and doing it. sean: new world order? what is that even mean question mike that s right. joe wants to get a new deal, gives tens of billions of dollars to your ran, $10 billion iranian russian nuclear facility to be built. and let iran get rich selling us oil or sending emissaries over to venezuela and trying to work out a deal with them to buy their oil and begging opec who keep rejecting him oil we can produce in the usa that s not exactly a rejection of leadership or freedom, but i
him no more insolence, serve! thankfully , in the hearings today, a few senators did ask relative questions be here is josh hawley. this is a child case for the defendant this routed multiple images of child porn, the federal guidelines recommend a sentence to 121 months in prison. prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison. judge jackson gave the defendant three months in prison. tucker: hm! that s pretty serious. why did she do that, judge jackson question mike here s the response. the guideline was based originally on a statutory scheme and on directives, specific directives by congress at a time in which more serious child
evidently testified that he not only got an injury under his eye but that he still has that injury. the jury can look at him and see that he doesn t have the injury. and if a doctor from northwestern testifying that he examined him and could find no injury. those types of basic facts that are right there in front of the jury are not doing himself any good to try to continue to perpetrate, perpetuate this in such a manner. i think it is a very different when you don t get to see a camera in the court. but i have to tell you, over the last few high-profile cases, i really believe in the jury, and dive all the confidence that the jury will make the right decision. shannon: and looking forward to matt finn s tweets from that tomorrow. another trial when there is also not a camera, the elaine maxwell trial. people keep asking why aren t their chemist question mike in 1994, the u.s. traditional conference which sets policy federal courts voted down an