Make their singhas biggest theye day moves as move toward a brexit deal. President trump says u. S. China trade talks are going very well. They continue in washington today. Plus, reports of an explosion on jeddahian tanker near send oil prices spiking. Matt we are 30 minutes away from the european open. I have got those oil prices on my screen. This is a threeday chart of brent crude. It has been climbing anyway on optimism for a u. S. China trade deal, so it was already up to almost 60 a barrel. Now it has jumped over that at 60. 40 on these reports, first from reuters, then from the oil news agency that i missile has struck an oil tanker and it is leaking oil into the red sea. Lets take a look at futures here. Weer we saw stackocks rally, are seeing futures rise on european indexes as well. On thet on the dax, and continental indexes, gaining when you have a big rally in the pound, then you expect to see a loss in equities, that negative correlation. Is it breaking down . I know you
Talking about how they strongly condemn radical violence against it. David it is a vicious cycle for the last weekend especially. To put some contacts into what she said, shop set to close. The Transportation System had to shut down. You understand why people are in way or saying home and why shes come out with more support measures. Right now, these are life pictures. She is taking pictures. The chief Executives Office with a press conference. To reiterate some of the line thinner come out. Were getting numbers on visitor arrivals. Yvonne we mentioned the drop of 50 in the first week of october. 15 . Ang kong may issue into recession in the Third Quarter. Taiwan saying the government will not interfere in hong kong protest. There has been speculation about stair influence prettily from taiwan. They seem to be bringing down those rumors of morning. From aet some analysis citigroups Global Market economist joining us in hong kong. Up localou gauging fallout, the economic fella in Hong K
Only if viewed objectively. And because nose av justice ti the government. Justice thas employing state action . Often, and suing the government. Things like medicare or government contracts, tieoblem if the government stays on the side of coercionecinal question. Rn ghin g,owbeurount ri cve rc plteneurthciy on ngar at chet innsn ye to let me follow up on that. Even if one of the plaintiffs have standing, we are requiredthhe utwas restricted at the time when the complaint was filed. Why ha oty eest t , thin and you havent attempted to show that the fio,th notion of traceability. Ta and the platforms are doing moderation. Action and then trace it to a single consequence . Mr. Fletcher i thomueorofafter. Justice alito i have looked at that. On the issue of causation are they required toivating factor . Mr. Fletcher i dont know the answer to that in all cases. Aal inres to 21 some of them involved platforms like linke Justice Sotomayor do you think there are any factual findings with resp
Will be hearing oral argument in murthy versus missouri, a case on federal Government Officials communicating with social Media Companies about content mediation policies and whether it amounts to government suppression or speech censorship. This oral argument will begin shortly. You are watching live coverage here on cspan. We will hear argument first this morning, case 23 411. Esther fletcher. Mr. Fletcher the government may not use corso threat to suppress speech but it is entitled the speed for itself i informing, persuading or criticizing private speakers. This case should be about the fundamental distinction between persuasion and coercion. This is not a typical student where a speaker challenges Government Actions affecting its own speech. Two states and five individuals are trying to use this to with and about social media platforms. That problem has infected every part of the case. Respondents dont have standing because they have not shown an imminent threat that the governmen
The oral argument is one hour and 45 minutes. Chief justice rober will hear argument first is morning, case 23411, murthy v. Missouri. Mr. Fletcher. Mr. Fletcher thank you. The government may not use corso threat tsuress speech but it is entitled the speed for itself i informing, persuading or cricing private speakers. This case should be about the fundamental distinction between peuasion and coercion. This is not a typical student where a spkechallenges Government Actions affecting its own speech. Two states and five diduals are trying to use this to with and about social media platforms. That problem has infected every part of the case. Respondents dont have standing because they he t shown an imminent threat that the government will cause the platform to monitor your post in particular. A lowercase viewed a vast range of speech without asking whether it had anything to do th responses. The courts entered a universal injunction restricting speec about any content. Even apart from the