As close as they can in real time. We do that by arranging the energy with the grid operator. The idea of firming and shape sg you produce a specific amountf Renewable Energy and that energy is delivered into the grid but you can using all the resources in the grid shape it . Into a profile that supports your consumers demand. The same amount of Renewable Energy is produced from that product as from the product content in category one product and the product conitant cat tent 3. Renewable yeents are merely documentation that a given amount of Renewable Energy is generated and delivered to the grid. Okay. So, then just going back to my question, for category 3 that is the only category where potentially we would go outside of the state unless it is on the boarder and delivered within california but that is the category where potentially we could purchase Renewable Energy credits . The category 3 are sort of the most liquid, they are the most easily traded. It doesnt have to be a out of
Under sickz 3 of that porz thf code, what are some of the other categories that would fall under that . For example one of my concernicize potentially we can go outside california, we could obtain power that is potentially not clean and green so wonder if puc or [inaudible] can speak to that issue because i think is valid one the Initiative Measure was trying to address. Im happy to take a stab at that. So, under california state rules and the code that you cited the state created 3 sort of buckets or categories, we call buckets or proctcontunt categories. The first categories is a bundled Renewable Energy product. That means the purchases of the Renewable Energy acquired the energy with a Renewable Energy cred squt the underlying electricity prior to the generation of that electricity. It means the electricity was dlinch today the state of california. It doesnt mean the resource is located in the state, it could be located on the boarder, but under the law of category one resource has
Commissioner wiener. Present. Wiener present and we have a quorum. I want to recognize sfgovtv that make pos all of our meetings available online, as well as a transcript please call item no. 2. Progress update on the Treasure Island transportation Implementation Plan information item. This is our only item of substance. Its an information item and we have some residents here from the island as well, who will be speaking at Public Comment. Thank you. Good morning, rachel hyatt, principal Transportation Planner. I have an update on the Transportation Planning for the island, and please do ask me clarifying questions as we go along. The Transportation Planning work for the redevelopment of yerba buena and Treasure Island has been going on for over ten years now. The first Transportation Plan was adopted in 2006 as part of the Development Te sheet between the master developer and set out the needs for Treasure Island and yerba buena and some strategis to meet the Transportation Needs as t
Determining whether or not this was going to be something that was workable in marin and whether it was something that the customers in marin were interested in. When we launched in may of 2010, we needed 2. 2 million to get off the ground. Today our finances are looking really good. Weve got a budget of 100 million budget and were in net position of 8 million. We are providing service to approximately 125,000 customers in our service area which includes the county of marin but the city of richmond. The city much richmond expressed interest in joining Marin Clean Energy a couple of years ago and we started service to richmond customers last summer, so about exactly one year ago. Were assuming 77 of the customers in our area, so in marin and richmond and the other portion of those customers have decided to opt out and stay with say that again. Were serving 77 of the people in our area. And the other 77 percent opted out and remain with pch services. We have reduced by 131 million towns.
We started up, we spent about a million and a half on our initial feasibility studies determining whether or not this was going to be something that was workable in marin and whether it was something that the customers in marin were interested in. When we launched in may of 2010, we needed 2. 2 million to get off the ground. Today our finances are looking really good. Weve got a budget of 100 million budget and were in net position of 8 million. We are providing service to approximately 125,000 customers in our service area which includes the county of marin but the city of richmond. The city much richmond expressed interest in joining Marin Clean Energy a couple of years ago and we started service to richmond customers last summer, so about exactly one year ago. Were assuming 77 of the customers in our area, so in marin and richmond and the other portion of those customers have decided to opt out and stay with say that again. Were serving 77 of the people in our area. And the other 77