this is a culmination of an anonymously long and contentious debate gives it a sense about the importance of this decision as you look back over 50 years. it is profoundly important. justice mentioned in his opinion, that decision roe v wade is primarily response over the culture war that ensued. it did a normative damage to the cultural view get these scenes. was justice byron white said from the dissent from that decision it was a raw exercise of judicial power. that is quite the beginning of judicial activism. the most extreme expression of judicial activism. yet we find rights and the law that don t exist, are not really supportable by legislation. that to set up a long friending 50 year battle in the united states. what happened to happen there s no that is going to change. what has changed here i think is that with this opinion the majority have established legitimacy of supreme court and the fact it does have to adhere to the text of the constitution. cannot make up
fentanyl meth and cocaine at all these other drugs that are killing 300 americans a week. the latest coming up and we will bring you all the low lights from karine jean-pierre s hard-hitting interview in case you missed it on the view yesterday which despite the softball questions, was a big challenge for the brand-new white house secretary. look at your screen, they say you miss 100% of the shots you don t take but if you are kamala harris, the same it might be true for 100% of the shots you do take. we will have some of that fun video straight ahead but first, we turn to today s big news out of the u.s. supreme court. in a 6-3 landmark decision the court struck down a new york state law forcing individuals to show proper because in order to obtain a conceal and carry permit. the so-called proper cause provision is often difficult to prove and in a place like new york city is almost impossible to get a concealed carry permit. the state asks law-abiding citizens, they must
and all these other drugs that are killing up toe three hundred americans a week30 . we ll have the very latest coming up. plus we ll bring you all of the lowlightss. karine jean-pierre is hard hitting interview in case youd missed it on the view from i earlier today which despite all the softball questions turnedll out to be a big challenge for britain s brand new white house press secretary. t also tonight , look at your screen. they say you miss 100% the shots you don t take. but if you kamala harris, the same might be true for 100% of the shots youou do take. we ll have h some of that fun video straight ahead. but first we turn to today shead big newsn t out of the u.s.. supreme court in a six three landmark decision, the court struck down a new york state law forcing individual to showr proper cause in order to obtain a concealed carry permit. now the so-called proper clause provision is often difficult to prove and a dangerous city like new york city, it s a almostla im
new names of republican lawmakers who allegedly asked trump for pardons, plus learning from the film maker who turned over hours of footage of the president and his family to the january 6th committee. what did he tell investigators today? and a major decision from the supreme court on guns. critics say it s adding fuel to the fire when it comes to gun violence in america. let s go outfront. and good evening, i m erin burnett. outfront tonight, just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me. it s a quote, a brazen statement from then-president trump after he had been told that every single allegation of mass fraud was faulse, every one. his response, say it was corrupt, leave the rest to me, a quote the deputy general richard donohue told today that trump told him on december 27th, 2020. you also noted mr. rosen said to mr. trump, quote, doj can t and won t snap its fingers and change the election. how did the president respond to that, sir? he respon
new york cause acquirement violates the 14th amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense neede their right to keep and bear arms in public. in other words, our right to keep and bear arms is specifically defined and enumerated as our right in our constitution. in the dissenting opinion, far left justice breyer tossed the constitution write out the window, offered a purely emotional argument about guns and about violence, even evoking the massacre in buffalo. but as justice alito pointed out, new york s proper cause law didn t prevent the buffalo shooting in any way. instead, new york s unconstitutional requirement only blogs law-abiding americans from carrying a gun outside of their home for self-defense. now this major ruling will set precedent for future gun laws and will almost certainly impact similar proper clause regulations. it s now in six other states and