we had an assault weapons ban very much like the ones thatat democrats in the senate are proposing. we had it for ten years, and we know, because it was studied exhaustively, that it saved no lives. what is the motive in re-imposing the law? i noticed on your data, you did not put that 90,000 are shot, 30,000 killed by guns every single year but the real question is tucker: which percent are suicides? people are acting like that matters. tucker: it does matter, the majority are suicides. two-thirds were suicides. that means 10,000 americans are murdered.00 that s one. and two, which is critically important, it shows the presence of the gun increases a successful suicide percentage. so that is important. tucker: just as a side note, you are suddenly against suicide when it is committed by a gun? i want to make sure that we
cut forward four months to the start of january, and then we have the most extraordinary situation where it turns out to that somebody very close to the shooter phoned the fbi tip line designed for tips about crime and potential crime and said that this guy is dangerous, he is heavily armed. we think that he may shoot up the school. they gave them chapter and verse on this bloke. and to the fbi did not even refer it to its head office in miami. it did not even see it despite having two warnings that this guy might be armed, dangerous, unstable, mentally ill, and prepared to shoot a school up. putting those two things together, and i m sorry, this is a pretty appalling performance by the fbi leading me to conclude in my column today that will be better off calling them the federal bureau of incompetence. tucker: i think your interpretation is right, you add to that to the las vegas
tucker: here in washington, all the focus is on russia, daca, plans to regulate guns, meanwhile, the country that washington rules seems to be hollowing out. if you don t believe us, watch this. we want to show you jarring footage last month of orange county, california, one of the country s richest places. showing one of the vast homeless encampments that has become routine in southern california. watch this.
knew that press people were talking to him about the dossier in 2016, now we do not know who the press people were, it is possible that he did not know the democrats paid for it at that time, but clearly he knew about the dossier back in 2016.i tucker: thank you for coming on and clearing that up, i appreciate it. thanks, tucker. tucker: last year the trump administration cracked down on a chicago-area bakery that employed thousands of illegal workers, what happened after that? interesting story. stay tuned.
interested in that collusion, we have also found felony leaks, nobody seems to be interested in getting to the bottom of the felony leaks, so it is part of what the house intelligence committee led by the republicans are trying to get to the bottom of despite what we are up against a lot ofn odds. we are not getting help from the democrats in the house and also not getting any help from the mainstream media. tucker: and you are being lied to. here s an example of the line going on, john brennan, the ciae director, comes before congress and testifies under oath that he had no idea who wrote the trump dossier and that that dossier formed the basis of no conclusion by the intel community. it seems very much like a lie, because the fbi knew exactly who wrote to the dossier, he lied to congress under oath, will he face perjury charges for that? why not if not? we sent out a questionnaire today, and we are asking several former and current officials to answer ten simple questions.