of information. nobody s really kind of put it together that way. we ve all seen slices of it appearing as we ve learned about them. this makes the case. and it really, jake starts out asking the question was it a coup? and it certainly was a coup d etat, which is a blow against the state. now, preet would know the law of sedition better than i from his experience but if this doesn t hit all of the bells on the sedition statute where it s use of force to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the united states, i don t know what does. then it would certainly fall into a general conspiracy statute where you re defrauding the united states. why nthere isn t a grand jury ot that s looking at that and we re reporting about that and talking about that, it baffles me. preet? well, you know, i do know about the law of seditious conspiracy. it might not surprise you to learn it didn t come up that often in the southern district of new york when i was the u.s.
is he protected by the statement he issued after the fact. you re not buying the walkback but pe hut up the follow-up statement. he did, he knows he s cross it had line under criminal conduct, under the sedition statute and under the uniform code of military justice which does apply to him retired from active service. so the bottom line is that this is part of a continued pattern. this didn t just happen once. so he s got a lot of explaining to do, including what happened in that white house meeting with president trump and others where they were planning and discussing the possibility of a military takeover to redo the election. and this should be prosecuted by the justice department or by the united states army. but i want to emphasize that it s critically important that congress investigate what happened on january 6th, what happened at that meeting in the white house in november, with general flynn.