the bbc is funded. it's funded through the licence fee. it's paid for by the british public. and he responded. he responded first of alljust saying, "0h, do you think this label is inaccurate? " and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said, maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer e—mail. he said, "we are aiming for maximum transparency and accuracy, linking to ownership and source of funds probably makes sense. i do think media organisations should be self—aware and not falsely claim the complete absence of bias. all organisations have bias, some obviously, much more than others. i should note that i follow bbc news on twitter because i think it is among the least biased." now, i think what you get an impression of there is that this is policy that is not defined yet. this is most certainly spitballing. it is policy on the hoof. he is thinking, he is being
thank you for that. twitter has added a label to one of the bbc�*s accounts, saying it is �*government funded media'. the bbc objected to the label saying it is independent, and funded by the british public through the licence fee. twitter owner elon musk emailed our north america technology reporterjames clayton. so let's hear from james in san francisco. well, when i saw that twitter had added this label, i decided just to email elon musk. i'm a technology reporter. sometimes, we do reach out to twitter. ijust thought i would email elon musk and just say to him, "look, this is actually how the bbc is funded. it's funded through the licence fee. it's paid for by the british public." and he responded. he responded first of alljust saying, "oh, do you think this label is inaccurate? " and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said, maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer email. he said, "we are aiming
emailed our north america technology reporter, james clayton. so let's hear from james in san francisco. well, when i saw that twitter had added this label, i decided just to email elon musk. i'm a technology reporter. sometimes, we do reach out to twitter. ijust thought i would email elon musk and just say to him, "look, this is actually how the bbc is funded. it's funded through the licence fee. it's paid for by the british public." and he responded. he responded first of alljust saying, "0h, do you think this label is inaccurate? " and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said, maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer email. he said, "we are aiming for maximum transparency and accuracy. linking to ownership and source of funds probably makes sense. i do think media organisations should be self—aware and not falsely claim the complete absence of bias. all organisations have bias, some obviously,
opening up of the economies and fuller economic reopening, domestic story will be the key driver if you look at china alone the magnitude of excess savings are 20 trillion rmb and 22 alone. this sort of revenge spending and pent—up demand will re—drive the other part of the equation, not so much on the equation, not so much on the external side because we know there are headwinds. but within the region for over the past couple of years the region has become more resilient in terms of sourcing, the demand within itself. we know trade in export here. within itself. we know trade in exoort here-— export here. talking about the o timism export here. talking about the optimism in — export here. talking about the optimism in some _ export here. talking about the optimism in some parts - export here. talking about the optimism in some parts of - export here. talking about the i optimism in some parts of asia, particularly given the fact that domestic demand is helping to drive up economic growth. for now that is it from us. thank you so much for watching.
i'm a technology reporter. sometimes we do reach out to twitter, and i thought i would email elon musk and just say to him, look, this is actually how the bbc is funded. it's funded through the licence fee, it's paid for by the british public. and he responded, he responded first of alljust saying, oh, do you think this label is inaccurate? and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer email. he said...
"look, this is actually how the bbc is funded. it's funded through the licence fee. it's paid for by the british public." and he responded. he responded first of alljust saying, "oh, do you think this label is inaccurate? " and then he came up with a suggestion himself. he said, maybe the accounts themselves should link to the sourcing of funding. i then pushed him on that and he gave me a much sort of longer email. he said, "we are aiming for maximum transparency and accuracy. linking to ownership and source of funds probably makes sense. i do think media organisations should be self—aware and not falsely claim the complete absence of bias. all organisations have bias, some obviously, much more than others. i should note that i follow bbc news on twitter because i think it is among the least biased." now, i think what you get an impression of there is that this is policy that is not defined yet. this is most certainly spitballing.
the rest of asia? certainly with a slowin: the rest of asia? certainly with a slowing global— the rest of asia? certainly with a slowing global road, _ the rest of asia? certainly with a slowing global road, look- the rest of asia? certainly with a slowing global road, look at - the rest of asia? certainly with a slowing global road, look at the | the rest of asia? certainly with a i slowing global road, look at the us and europe, there are headwinds but we are optimistic because of the opening up of the economies and economic reopening, domestic story will be the key driver if you look at china alone the magnitude of excess savings as amounting to close to 20 trillion are in default of this sort of revenge spending, pent—up demand will re—drive the other part of the equation, not so much the external size because we know there are headwinds but within the region over the past couple years the region has become more resilient in terms of sourcing, the demand within itself, consuming goods and services and interest rates. ., ~' , ., goods and services and interest rates. . ~ , ., goods and services and interest rates. . ~ . ., goods and services and interest rates. . . ., ., rates. thank you so much for “oining us on asia business �* rates. thank you so much for “oining us on asia business report. h rates. thank you so much forjoining us on asia business report. let's - us on asia business report. let's
years at in a year when they're going to consider this. i think it's 18 94 abortion law and try to get it off the books there. how big is that win for liberals in the state? and what does it say about abortion and driving factor in 2024? look, i think it's a huge deal. you know, i grew up with conservatives who in wisconsin who literally grow up, but professionally i grew up . you know, wisconsin conservatives really well, they value the supreme court seats. extremely this is a very painful loss for conservatives in wisconsin, and it's a demonstration. look there's this whole theory that has sort of in sourcing parts of the right that they can win every election just with the kinds of people who cheered at the trump mar-a-lago rally last night. and the chasm between the base republicans and the persuadable middle is just turning into a just a massive chasm and, um, the wisconsin showing shows that actually when
but he has sort of promised to turn the company around, make it more profitable, make it more accessible, rather than something thatjust news organisations or politicians use. he has also promised a lot of other things and hasn't delivered on it. so it's really hard at this stage to understand what things he's promising are going to happen. you know, he's promised that he would start paying creators fortheir content, much like many other platforms. and that was going to have started many weeks ago and no one's seen any of that money coming forwards. he did deliver on the open sourcing of the algorithm to reveal a bit more about how the algorithm works, but as to how effective that will be in terms of making it a more profitable site is yet to be seen because i'm not sure. so you've got now the new york times with more than 55 million followers without a verification tick. exactly. you know, this is leaving accounts like the new york times and others open to impersonation. you know, some might argue, well, if it's that important to them about impersonation, then they should stump up the money and pay for it. that's one, you know, one for everyone else to decide
quoting to people familiar with the matter. the "new york times" credits its reporting on the judge's ordering mike pence's testimony, quote, to two people familiar with the matter. that kind of sourcing usually means pence's lawyers or pence staff. because there have been no leaks whatsoever that have the slightest indication that they have come from the office of special prosecutor jack smith. and, of course, mike pence's team has an incentive to leak this information. because, for them, it is political information. they know that mike pence will be seen going into that grand jury and coming out of that grand jury. and, so, mike pence's political want to prepare republican voters for that news that mike pence is going to testify to jack smith's grand jury, which is why mike pence himself