Lisa, you are staying with, me next another donald trump case move to trial this tuesday. whether he testifies, even shows up, well, that i anyone s guess plus, a string of shooting where the victims were simpl in the wrong place at the wron time we are going to ask of right-wing media is stoking th culture of fear in a heavily armed nation first, jessica layton, standin by with other big stories. we are watching this hour, o msnbc. jessica? thank you we continue to follow that breaking news from sudan, wher clashes continue between the army and militant groups there the country s army announced evacuation of diplomats from the u.s., uk, france, an china. that is expected to start soon two sources tell nbc news that the biden white house is leaning towards thos evacuations, the pentagon, meanwhile, says it i monitoring the situation and preparing for variou contingencies. the lawyer for accused d.i.o de leaker, jack to share, it declined to comment to nbc news,
And that s hakeem jeffries we re joining in with th advocate for gun safet legislation. and we won t be silent we re gonna keep going there s much to do we ll be watching of course as you try and make thos moves. with the return to washington. talk to me about the leake documents out of the pentagon? your concerns on this, the revelations that the inner thinking of the government right now that we re learnin from these leaked documents. and how could affect our standing on the world stage? i will affect our standin on the world stage absolutely it s almost like having a best friend, and you have confidenc to tell that best friend you deepest secrets, how horribl it would be to see those secrets in a newspaper or on social media that s what i think our allies and friends, and there are allies and friends, but in order to collaborate intelligence is a national security part. of our nation. we have our military, we hav
I will come to you docto sharfstein on the two appellat judges in the fifth circuit wh issued this complicated ruling one of the most importan things here is, and to the plaintiffs, the people suing these antiabortion groups, medical providers, who won thi bill taken off the shelves, do they have standing can they show the court ther is an injury, do they get to come into court and say, w were hurt by this decision those two judges upheld an that they do have standing why is that such a radical interpretation of this basic legal concept? the ruling might be complicated but it s actuall pretty simple. these plaintiffs just don have standing at all the court of appeals said thes plaintiffs, the organization o various doctors have standin because the court declared a statistical certainty that som person somewhere wit experience complications fro medication abortion an therefore one of these doctors would be called upon to trea them and that argument just rests o
Mifepristone it s brought by doctors who sa they when they were in the emergency room, they cam across women who had bad effects, and therefore, in the future, they may somewhere a some point, encounter some woman who theoretically - and so that, typically, i seen as quite speculative, and not enough to get into federal court. instead, the fifth circuit has had, that s just fine. and that s a view of standin that perhaps - they don t know, perhaps - perhaps the supreme court ma decide it does not work fo them but we don t know. you are looking at m skeptically because we know how the court is - we know how the court has ruled on abortion and wher they stand ideologically let s just say it sure but there are a lot of reasons jurisprudence wise, this might bother them. absolutely. because this is preceden setting. setting aside the issue of abortion, what is bein proposed here legally is reall out of the ordinary and for th fifth circuit not to just toss this out on standin
Well, mifepristone is stil available. isn t that actually a victor for people who are advocates o choice it seems like once you actuall get down to brass tacks, it is not a good ruling at all on lot of - for a number of reasons, for people who are advocates o folks having reproductiv choice the language in the opinion is striking, especially as i relates to standing, which i the legal right to sue i court. and on that score, the fifth circuit panel to trump appointees and th george w. bush appointee - pound for pound are in the plaintiffs camp here and remember, this case is brought by advocacy groups and for doctors. it is not brought by women who say they were armed by mifepristone it s not even brought by doctors who say they prescribe mifepristone it s brought by doctors who sa they when they were in the emergency room, they cam across women who had bad effects, and therefore, in the future, they may somewhere a some point, encounter some woman who theoretically - and so