Classified documents, or other classified information, they have to group up in court, and that this is actual, national defense information and it was damaging u.s. national security, including causing exceptionally grand damage. sometimes, the intelligence committee says no, we won t let you go to court to say that. so, it remains to be seen. it was before it became any at all, and where they became they were mishandling toward this classified information. let me follow up on that with the lindsey graham developments. just a follow-up, there is the possibility of obstruction, which is named in the subpoena, in which there seems to be a lot of evidence. we have lawyers being asked to attest to things, and refusing to do so. we have an email, i think, coming out today from eric herschmann saying, i would not say that everything is not
Proceeding. i think they did a good job to summarize the different methods by which trump acted corruptly and fraudulently. i think that there is more than a sufficient basis for the committee to subpoena trump. it is trump to sue, and try to avoid a testimony before complying with the subpoena. it was the same manner they lost one, they try to prevent the archives, the national archives, from producing the white house documents the january six committee. it was a first step in this battle. hawaii it was trump attempting to hawaii view with them. there is going to go to, why do you think they would lose? i think they would lose because there is no privilege it attaches to a former
Classified here. so, i think there is really willful obstruction to dissent, and to hide tests from them. is that a way to square the circle? there are other possible charges here, but also, just a presidential record. mishandling of government possibilities. neither of those would require the government to actually prove up the national defense information quality of the materials that were taken. so, two things are happening here. the imperative to bring the case, and it gets greater when we see how sensitive as it were. it needs to be intentionally making that a feasible option. let s talk about lindsey graham, and on his subpoena today, to get that speed here. this is a case out of fulton county georgia, and it is not
Tonight, on all in. we are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who sent us all in motion. the january 6th committee, commanding donald trump s appearance on the day that steve bannon gets to prison for blowing them off. tonight, george conway on the documents, and testimony that the committee is seeking in the subpoena of donald trump. then, why was the ex president, reportedly, keeping classified intelligence about iran, and china? explosive new details is the stolen documents at mar-a-lago. plus, the victims of the wrong desantis election fraud stunt has charges dropped. no referred to the doj from arizona, and an all in, starting right now good evening, from new york, i m chris hayes. there s many crimes of donald trump stands accused, of many legal challenges he faces, the
The violent attack on the capitol was occurring in which you incited further violence by publicly condemning your vice president. and, refusing for hours to disband your rioting supporters by instructing them to leave the capitol, while you watched the attack unfold on television. none of that is new. we know it all, but it is a very, very, damning document, all in one place. the committee acknowledges the gravity of the situation when they write, we recognize that a of the former president is a significant, and historic action. we do not take this action lightly. but the committee goes on to note, trump would hardly be the first ex president to testify before congress. john quincy adams, john tyler, theodore roosevelt, william howard taft, herbert hoover, harry truman, gerald ford, all testified to congress after leaving office. trump s defenders will note, president truman, also, defied a congressional subpoena after leaving office, but we should know, that was a subpoena from th