it says something about religion and they did not consider the president s tweets and public statements about cracking down on muslim. justice sotomayor evoked a ruling that put japanese-american into internment campus. camps. she said: since this is the 3rd version it s watered down. it includes 2 non-muslim countries and the muslim majority countries only cover 8% of muslim around the world. the reaction of muslim elected to congress suggested otherwise. this is a great victory for our constitution. we have to be tough and safe and secure. now this can be applyed in other areas. this is a rub her stamp supre
sh schumer came forward with part of the negotiation. if the democrats who created this daca by the fate of president obama i want to talk about the daca issue but first when you say this is not racist. i want to play what the president said about europeans, supre issue prim assists. here he is. why aren t we letting people in from europe? i have many, many friends and nobody wants to talk this. nobody wants to say this. we have our inner cities, african-americans, his panics are living in hell because it s so dangerous. you walk down the street you get shot. you have a group on the other side that was very violent. you also had people that were
the most vile, racist and disgusting and monstrous corners of the internet posted by people who want to demonize muslims or african-americans or other groups. the president s decision to broadcast them to his 43 million followers were celebrated by none other than white supre supremacist david duke who took to twitter to say thank god for trump. that s why we love him. three months ago the president quite famously refused to take sides between the white spremists who marched with tiki torches in charlottesville who ended up killing a woman. and the anti-racist protests who were there to reject their message. yes, i think there s blame on both sides. you look at you look at both sides, i think there s blame on both sides, and i have no doubt about it and you don t have any doubt about it either. you have some very bad people in that group but you also had people that were very fine
says, then i suppose that we re past the holding in shurose, even though by sheppard dicing, it s still considered controlling in this district unless the supreme court has said otherwise. that s my hesitation, i m still trying to dig through that. do you want us to come back to that one? other than that, does the state s version of the instruction comport with the supre supreme court s required for manslaughter by act? it seems to, yes. so the only issue we have is your determination that the shurose case is covered by this instruction? yes. okay. we ll come back to that issue. thank you, judge. the other lesser included requested by the state, and i point out i included the next case, martin versus state, the 1977 decision of the florida supreme court, simply as the reas reason and i think i
it called the appeal. he read this book in a day and said it s superb, and he said he wished he had written the book, itself. you write about the whole problem of judicial bias when there s money flooding into these judicial elections. a very new thing in american democracy. what to ydo you do with a supre court ruling that says if a judge gets a lot of money, it s biased, they have to recuse themselves. on the other hand, if there s a lot of money flowing around, you can knock judges off cases. it seems like a troubling standard and it s new. where s it going to go from here? blankenship spent $3.5 million electing one justice who then voted his way, a $50 million judgment in caperton that my two lawyer heroes got in a court in west virginia. he voted his way. went to the united states supreme court. where ted olson argued and the court said you can t do this anymore. although in citizens united a few months later, they said in the rest of the political system