romney releases tax returns that did not stop senate majority leader harry reid at the time from lying about on the senate floor and claimant mitt romney never paid any taxes which is a light. he never apologized for onset it works. mitt romney destroyed his campaign for the big take away for me from trump's taxes are two things. one is donald trump.poor by serving in public office. people like joe biden and nancy pelosi have made a fortune on government salaries working in public office. that is a big difference. to me that the most important take away. all his hoople squalling about trump's tax return put in place all the irs rules. all of the tax loopholes that donald trump took advantage of. i really do not know why they're so upset about all of this. alicia: rigid and going to be 15 seconds of a button on it.
romney releases tax returns that did not stop senate majority leader harry reid at the time from lying about on the senate floor and claimant mitt romney never paid any taxes which is a light. he never apologized for onset it works. mitt romney destroyed his campaign for the big take away for me from trump's taxes are two things. one is donald trump.poor by serving in public office. people like joe biden and nancy pelosi have made a fortune on government salaries working in public office. that is a big difference. to me that the most important take away. all his hoople squalling about trump's tax return put in place all the irs rules. all of the tax loopholes that donald trump took advantage of. i really do not know why they're so upset about all of this. alicia: rigid and going to be 15 seconds of a button on it.
nothing in there that exploited legal tax loopholes to pay as little in taxes as possible. no smoking gun here. this was a real partisan pursuit here. i think you have to look through that lens. while you are examining the tax returns. >> donald trump saying the radical left never should have released his returns. once again they show how probably successful i have been in have been able to use depreciation and other tax incentives as a way to start this. he is bragging about how little he paid. >> yeah. i am not sure if there's anything new here. donald trump spinning the fact that he lost money. look. i think that it is fascinating and the media.
there are hundreds of pages from the ways and means committee, from the joint committee on taxation, and the tax returns themselves. and you hear, or you read in these reports from the committees the difficulty the irs had with these particular returns because of the number of possible entities that donald trump is using. basically what that means is, you've got a hold of companies that he has interest in and, those flow to his personal income taxes. and he basically claims this huge loss of, the, deductions exemptions, charitable donations, to try to minimize his personal taxes. and, as you saw with that graphic just a minute ago, $750 in a couple of years, nothing in another. >> $750 is insane. i think it is very hard to people to believe. so, i will pay double sabbath. there are people out there that would say, look, donald trump was using very legitimate tax loopholes that currently exist. now, i know in the inflation reduction act that was passed earlier this year, there were some provisions in there to potentially close some of these
can tag the larger and larger question about that iris russians and talking points about help more irs enforcement of the going to go after people like donald trump you are very equipped with lawyers and legal teams to you know, use the tax loopholes and avoid paying and illegally and aboveboard way and the irs and i think many conservatives the lease feel like it's going to target smaller working-class families and but in terms of the national euro media conversation, okay you got what you wanted and there's trump's tax returns and i don't think it was a lot to it. howard: because a previously to the new york times we knew that he was going to be much and women better it's also had release the tax returns as every major candidate has done over the last four years when he first ran but what is to solve the republican now to take over the house next week from retaliating against public figures they don't like. guest: will the retaliation has already happened and we know that there item is investigations and investigations and investigations of that is
that is the end of her reign. kevin mccarthy is going to maybe -- that's a whole other discussion -- lead to the house next year. and this is not going to be a priority of his. and so one thing that is really interesting to me is what these taxes do, what these texas show, and what sort of impact it is going to have on other investigations, perhaps the new york investigation into donald trump -- and house democrats have said throughout this process, for the past three years, their argument in court has been the reason they need this is for a legislative purpose -- to ensure that tax loopholes can -- that they can try to close any sort of tax loopholes. but, stephanie ruhle, they are running out of time to do that. >> joyce, for four years we heard about trump cabinet secretaries, big name trump appointees, and had countless examples of how they were working for themselves or don't
to ensure that tax loopholes, that they can try to close any sort of tax loopholes. but they are running out of time to do any of that. >> joyce, for four years we heard about trump cabinet secretaries, big name trump appointees and have countless examples of how they were working for themselves or donald trump before the american people. but i want to talk more about this head of the iris, and share with david cay johnston said about him early tonight. >> the irs commissioner appointed by donald trump who was a beverly hills tax lawyer specialist and helping suspected tax cheats avoided indictment, and pay as little as possible. >> could this caribbean real trouble? >> i think everyone is entitled to do process. investigation is to be conducted here to determine what controlling and why it went wrong. the irs has a policy, it is a
we were proposing to, yes, increase taxation for the very richest, yes, and close down the tax loopholes, yes. we were also proposing to invest a great deal in housing and education. now, this is a relatively rare interview for you to do, at least with what your allies would largely call the mainstream media. you didn't much enjoy doing interviews, i recall, when you were leader of the party. and what i'm hoping we do is not rerun one of those. we'll do some policy, but we want to get a sense of what makes you tick, what explains the values, if you like. one of these things, it seems to me, that is at the root of your popularity, but also what unnerves some people is a kind of moral consistency. people who look like you say, "isn't that brilliant? he's not changed for years." and people who don't like you say "isn't that really alarming? he never changes his mind." well, i think one should have a consistent set of values in life.
irresponsible. john mcdonnell, at the same time, said that we would not borrow to cover day—to—day spending, we would only borrow for investment. what the government has now done is borrow billions, or is in the process of borrowing billions, in order to pay for day—to—day expenditure, because they've just cut their own income level. so, this isn't corbynomics? you're saying they're just too irresponsible, the tories? we were proposing to, yes, increase taxation for the very richest, yes, and close down the tax loopholes, yes. we were also proposing to invest a great deal in housing and education. now, this is a relatively rare interview for you to do, at least with what your allies would largely call the mainstream media. you didn't much enjoy doing interviews, i recall, when you were leader of the party. and what i'm hoping we do is not rerun one of those. we'll do some policy, but we want to get a sense of what makes you tick, what explains the values, if you like. one of these things,
republicans, more than two thirds, as you, said in a toss-up in these states, candidates to oppose -- took a double hit. they gave their opponent a 35-point edge overall. and a stunning 56-point edge with suburban women. i think voters are fed up. women voters in particular. i think this is something, this is an issue that motivates activates women across the political spectrum. as we have seen across the country, they are registering and record numbers. this could tip the scales. >> it is interesting, that point, when you marry the two issues, how voters see the internal inconsistency of forcing a person to carry a pregnancy to term. they're not providing the type of leave that would allow them to actually care for that child, care for the family. i find it interesting in the polling by global strategy groups how voters wants paid family leave, 70% support closing tax loopholes for major