depending on how members respond to this bill. so still some major questions despite the significant agreement that was reached late after these frantic negotiations. still uncertain whether they can get there and avoid the nation's first ever debt default by june 5th, the deadline for congress to get the bill through both chambers and get it signed into law. manu raju, cnn, capitol hill. >> well, mccarthy tried to wrangle support for the deal by outlining details in a conference call with conservatives. the house speaker said most republicans were excited about it, but many expressed concern on twitter. representative ken buck said, quote, i listened to speaker mccarthy earlier tonight outline the deal with president biden, and i'm appalled by the debt ceiling surrender. meantime ralph norman called the deal, quote, insanity. he said a $4 trillion debt ceiling increase with virtually no cuts is not what we agreed to, not going to vote to
in government spending until 2025. >> the white house and house republicans have reached an agreement in principle on the debt ceiling, this the outcome of 24 hours of tireless talks between hill negotiators and white house negotiators as they came up against that june 5th deadline when the u.s. would run out of funds and in an attempt to avert a debt default. now, over the course of the day white house officials said there was general optimism about the trajectory of these talks, some echoing what president biden had said on friday on his way to camp david that a deal was, quote, very close. but a pivotal moment came early saturday or saturday afternoon when president biden and house speaker kevin mccarthy connected over the phone, and that we are told is when they were able to reach an agreement in principle. now, of course over the next several hours both sides will be working on the text of this
nothing to do with politics. we see old a deteriorating old f period. lt iwho's was running for democt right now is irrelevant. s they're they're not goingther. to he's never going to get there. gavin newsom will probably the time is right in. >> the time is not right right now. gavin newsom, he's startin hegin newsom, he's startin to do things. he's starting to take positions that are more of the national in the california way. but the bottom line is and the thing with ninety seven days, he hardly wantsit'sn to negotiate with the president . it's notot t going to happen. you can't negotiate without we see the state of his speechess every day he does is controlled. when he gets into situations, when he's asked question he get that's when we see the deterioration. he's not going to run again. he can't. but here'sdete t the deal. h >> wait, wait.n this >> wait, wait.n this to run this campaign? i think eventually he's notn going to . but here's the thing. joe biden, even even biden a, along with you, even a deteriorated joe biden would still get votes because as longe as it's trump , because it'll be i will vote for deterioratedo biden before i will vote fors in trump . so as long as trump's biden's l in it, ifof something happens i trump goes out, look for a big.
contentious stuff and put that into the normal machinery where it should go through discussion, and whatever it attracts we will then ballot our members and they brought back a deal which did not even reflect the ground rules were brought down. 50. ground rules were brought down. so, has a deal being struck with network rail? there have been negotiations with various parties. some people will be thinking, i thought the train strikes had been sorted out an agreement had been made. we train strikes had been sorted out an agreement had been made.- train strikes had been sorted out an agreement had been made. we are a factionalised — agreement had been made. we are a factionalised industry _ agreement had been made. we are a factionalised industry and _ agreement had been made. we are a factionalised industry and i _ agreement had been made. we are a factionalised industry and i have - agreement had been made. we are a factionalised industry and i have no l factionalised industry and i have no members in network rail and i wasn't party to the deal and we were not involved in it. do party to the deal and we were not involved in it.— involved in it. do you think there is a compromise _ involved in it. do you think there is a compromise or— involved in it. do you think there is a compromise or a _ involved in it. do you think there is a compromise or a middle - involved in it. do you think there i is a compromise or a middle ground to be had if negotiations continue, or are we search to see more strikes which are disruptive, as you are well aware, which is the nature of strikes, disrupting eurovision in the fa cup final, are we destined to see more of those? this the fa cup final, are we destined to see more of those?— see more of those? this is a westminster _ see more of those? this is a westminster political - see more of those? this is a i westminster political problem, see more of those? this is a - westminster political problem, we don't have a problem in scotland,
those talks, so it's destined to fail. i don't think the government wants a solution.— fail. i don't think the government wants a solution. aslef has re'ected a deal that has i wants a solution. aslef has re'ected a deal that has been * wants a solution. aslef has re'ected a deal that has been offered, h wants a solution. aslef has rejected a deal that has been offered, a - a deal that has been offered, a two—year offer, seeing drivers getting a backdated pay rise of 4% for 2022 and 4% increase this year. the department for transport says, you will be aware of this, aslef has had a fair and reasonable offer which would the average train driver salary from 60,000 to 65,000 by the end of the year. the government has facilitated this very fair and reasonable offer. why is that off at such odds with what you have just said? such odds with what you have 'ust said? �* , .., such odds with what you have 'ust said? �*, ., ., said? let's call it out for the malicious — said? let's call it out for the malicious lies _ said? let's call it out for the malicious lies that _ said? let's call it out for the malicious lies that it - said? let's call it out for the malicious lies that it is. - said? let's call it out for the malicious lies that it is. it'sl said? let's call it out for the i malicious lies that it is. it's not a fair offer or a reasonable offer because the strings attached to it are about ripping up any condition we have gained in the last 140 years and virtually giving up our first—born. the reality of the offer is it is a less than rpi author, in
deal has not been reached that you would like to have been seen? $5 deal has not been reached that you would like to have been seen? as you know, would like to have been seen? as you know. naga. — would like to have been seen? as you know. naga. we _ would like to have been seen? as you know, naga, we have _ would like to have been seen? as you know, naga, we have spoken - would like to have been seen? as you know, naga, we have spoken many. know, naga, we have spoken many times before, we haven't had a pay rise for four years. we times before, we haven't had a pay rise forfour years. we have times before, we haven't had a pay rise for four years. we have sat down with good faith with the company continually trying to find a way forward and at some point people are going to realise that these are government led strikes. the government led strikes. the government are interfering with the free collective bargaining progress and they have sent out unrealistic targets that we can't deliver. they sent her to deal before christmas that we had never seen or negotiated and tried to put it through the back door with a total lack of faith, and even then we suspended all action in the hope of finding a way forward is and then what happens? we sit down for three months in good faith, we agree a process to undertake and write at the end someone interferes, revokes it and puts out a deal which would not contain all of the red lines we have previously said in
effect a 20% pay cut for giving up all of our conditions. we have all been told what our red lines were and what we would not give up so putting them back into the deal was a deliberate and malicious act to scupper the deal. can a deliberate and malicious act to scupper the deal.— a deliberate and malicious act to scupper the deal. can you explain to us, the scupper the deal. can you explain to us. the terms _ scupper the deal. can you explain to us, the terms and _ scupper the deal. can you explain to us, the terms and conditions - scupper the deal. can you explain to us, the terms and conditions are - us, the terms and conditions are very specific, but could you pick three things that we as viewers would understand are a real sticking point, and have been in offensive terms for you when they have been tried to change? ppm; terms for you when they have been tried to change?— tried to change? any right for future negotiations, - tried to change? any right for future negotiations, paying i tried to change? any right for| future negotiations, paying for tried to change? any right for - future negotiations, paying for our own training, terminating people early, they even put in that they would put in no compulsory redundancies from 2024 close, we don't know where that came from. we sat down after christmas and that debacle, finding some broadbrush stuff that we could apply it to get us out of this dispute, then anything else we will talk about we will scoped out, take out the
to appease the corporate people who have put her in positions of powerof power throughout here life. and she is one major thing, prich is promote war, promote broken borders, promote trade agreements that got americans and obviouslomtrade ay apparently give crony capitalism to corporations that e culturaleddlism to marxism on children. this is ridiculous. and fo r all of the crying aboutea gov standards, how mean he's been on disne y sincee the deal went simpsons, the fight happenede figh. >> disney has not weighed insinc on a single cultural fight. the pro-lifeight legislation, the gun legislation, the expansion of lthe the parens rights and education act, act.y. ht over e-verif disney has not weighed in at be all because they learnedca that just because you build a castle in florida doesn't make you the. king of the state. and right now, ron desantis hasn led with leadership and no one else has. i mean, where are these governors? they should be pushing this just t de as hard as the sandersdesat is on everything with theis corporations and their and their state contracts. s in thewell, ryan , a new harvd harris poll asked voters
>> more friendly questions >> where do you go to school >> - university >> so deal asked about thanksgiving, small talk >> what did you? eight >> i had turkey, stuffing, mash potatoes, casserole and this cabbage, bacon, salad that my mom really likes but i don't think david like the very much. >> except, this wasn't reall small talk detectives the deal was playin close attention. >> all right, so let's start with this morning. all right? you what time did you get up >> about 7:30. >> and what happened then? >> i talked, and then when i went back to sleep and when i woke up, he wasn' there. >> okay. i know that's a lie. >> no, no it's not >> you know i know it's a lie? because i saw you come out o your apartment, and get into the passenger seat of that car and i saw him drive out of there. that's why i know it is a lie. >> so the o was tough.
The following 10 books like The Deal are perfect if you enjoy reading about strict "just physical, no strings attached" agreements that could lead to true love.