of disclosure is that some of these business connections could potentially affect his impartiality. the public shouldn t be kept in the dark about conflicts of interest. the white house said from the beginning as it relates to all of these, we re not breaking the law. you get what you get and don t get upset. is there any law being broken here? not necessarily a law being broken at all. what his lawyers say is that these forms regularly get updated. that the connection to the start-up will be disclosed in a form that s currently being cleared. it is not necessarily laws being problem broken, but ethics experts say the best practice is all these are disclosed. if best practices are not being conducted, then what? across the board, whether it s ivanka trump getting three chinese trademarks and sitting next to the president of china
this is done. and this is over. and there is nothing that can be done, that tax money has been spent. this program has been opened and closed. but what do you think can be learned about the transparency of cia operating processes and the chain of command internally? obviously, the public shouldn t know who they are hiring at this time they are doing it, but what needs to change? well, i think what needs to change is and i m hoping the cia is doing this while they re kind of running defense. i hope they re also looking at this and saying how did this happen? how did we end up here? what is the process by which we ended up in this situation? and that s why i mean, it s like a plane crash. this seems to me like a train wreck or a plain crash, and the first thing you want to do is how it happened. and therefore you don t want it to happen again. at the same time, i do think it s important to point out that many people say, look, this is vilifying the cia, vilifying people that risk