reporter said on there there was no evidence with the vote count, calls and text, please get her fired, seriously. it needs to stop immediately, like tonight. it is hurting the company. the stock price is down. not a joke. rupert murdoch was facing having to give evidence in court. by settling, he avoided the need to explain why his news channel said trump may have won the election but he was mocking him as mad behind the scenes. fox news do not have to apologise or issue any corrections on the air, so will their political coverage change at all? 30 on the air, so will their political coverage change at all?- on the air, so will their political coverage change at all? 30 to 4096 of the republican _ coverage change at all? 30 to 4096 of the republican electorate _ coverage change at all? 30 to 4096 of the republican electorate are - coverage change at all? 30 to 4096 of the republican electorate are in - the republican electorate are in favour of donald trump. he will get coverage on fox, and it will probably be disproportional to anybody else. for probably be disproportional to anybody else-— probably be disproportional to an bod else. ., ., , anybody else. for fox news, the story isn't _ anybody else. for fox news, the story isn't over. _ anybody else. for fox news, the story isn't over. there _ anybody else. for fox news, the story isn't over. there is - anybody else. for fox news, the story isn't over. there is anotherj story isn't over. there is another lawsuit from another company that makes voting machines. that firm says it wants to expose more
presidential election, saying there was a problem with voting machines made by dominion, even though they knew that wasn't true. we don't know how many votes were stolen on tuesday night. we don't know anything about the software many say was rigged. we don't know. we talked about the dominion software. | i know that there were voting irregularities. . donald trump, refusing to admit he had lost the election, wanted to blame dominion�*s voting machines. with the turn of a dial, or the change of a chip, you can press a button for trump and the vote goes to biden. what kind of a system is this? fox news anchors like tucker carlson were worried that if they did not promote trump's lies they would lose viewers to smaller, conservative rivals, saying in a text... when a fox news reporter said on air there there was no evidence of problems with the vote count, carlson texted. ..
we talked about the dominion software, i know they were voting irregularities. donald trump, refusing to admit he had lost the election, wanted to blame dominion�*s voting machines. with the turn of a dial. or the change of a chip, you can press a button for trump and the vote goes to biden, - what kind of a system is this? fox news anchors were worried that if they did not promote trump's lies they would lose viewers to smaller conservative rivals, saying in a text... when a fox news reporter said on there there was no evidence with the vote count, carlson texted. .. rupert murdoch himself was facing having to give evidence in court. by settling, he avoided the need
take this may be. it may be that the firm didn't want the representation and maybe that the firm had conflicts of interest, and he couldn't have taken representation at the firm. it maybe. candidly donald trump is not popular here in manhattan. you'll be shocked to know i think i think the vote count in 2020 was 85% for joe biden here in manhattan. and so there may have been some reluctance to take on the representation. john explain the tangled web that we're talking about about how many of donald trump's lawyers know each other have represented each other have fired each other. have suit like i think we have a graphic let me pull this up for everybody. of the flow. okay, basically what we needed. we don't have it at the moment. but we will we needed a flow chart of how they all know each other. so there's a lot of crossover and you know, it starts with joe tacopina, who is donald trump's lead counsel right now, although that's now in debate since todd lance just said he's coming on as lead counsel, so there's two lead counsels, which in a discussion about tensions between lawyers, is demonstrative in and of
wickersham and taft. you know, a white shoe law firm. active job . i'm curious why he had to leave the firm to take this case. maybe it may be that the firm didn't want the representation may be that the firm had conflicts of interest, and he couldn't have taken representation at the firm. it maybe. candidly donald trump is not popular here in manhattan. you'll be shocked to know i think i think the vote count in 2020 was 85% for joe biden here in manhattan. and so there may have been some reluctance to take on the representation. john explain the tangled web that we're talking about about how many of donald trump's lawyers know each other have represented each other have fired each other. have suit like i think we have a graphic let me pull this up for everybody. of the flow. okay, basically what we needed. we don't have it at the moment. but we will we needed a flow chart of how they all know each other. so there's a lot of crossover and you know, it starts with joe tacopina, who is donald trump's lead counsel right now, although that's now in debate since todd lance just said he's coming on as lead counsel, so there's two lead
telling him that there was absolutely no evidence. that there was foreign involvement in rigging vote machine voting machines, for instance, which is something that trump was being told by what i think some of the witnesses have called team crazy people like ah, rudy giuliani and some of the other people who are trying to tell him that maybe there was some kind of interference right in voting machines, so the importance of these witnesses is two forwards for the special counsel. if they decide to bring a case is to be able to establish that trump even if he can claim right now that that he believed that vote fraud was real. he was getting different advice from his most closely appointed aids people who were, uh, who would have known right if there was any sign any evidence of foreign interference in in the voting machine and the vote count, and he was being told by robert o'brien by some of these other
face jail time for, you should face jail time for and remember, these are crimes that michael cohen has already gone to jail for, trump' underlying and so it's a little weird t think that the underlyin should go to jail, but not the person who directed th underling to commit the crimes in the first place again, i'm assuming that the prosecutors can prove all of this up in court in new york and i do think, just if on would've been the hierarchy of offenses, things like seditiou conspiracy and intention t obstruct an official proceedin of the january six vote count, who are trying to get fake 11,780 votes, are obviousl some of the most serious offenses to the criminal code, some of the most serious offenses to our democracy, t our way of life, to everything that we hold dear as americans falsification of busines records, potential tax evasion claiming that your hush mone payments to someone you had an
republican who is clearly don't like this, are you hearing anybody in the house on the republican side say maybe we're taking this a little far, and maybe worrying about what this lie is going to amount to later on. >> yeah, we quoted someone in our midday edition today, i think it was don bacon of nebraska who said that this is -- that the way carlson presented this was not -- was not appropriate, and by the way, katy, this isn't a debate. i lived through this, many of us lived through january 6th. we were in the capitol. this was not some sort of light hearted protest. this was an insurrection to stop the vote count of the presidential election, and don't take my word for it. like go look at the court transcripts and the depositions and all of the evidence that's basically in the public record of people kind of -- the people who made that attack, were part of that attack, that's what they said they were doing. you don't have to take my word for it. the interesting thing is, a few interesting thing, mccarthy is
democracy docket. eddie glaude is here, chairman of the department of african american studies at princeton university and an msnbc political analyst. marc, i start with you. i love and i know you love when these issues are in focus for anybody, especially the president. what did you think of his speech yesterday, and what does this look like moving forward? what does this work look like? >> look, president biden has been a leader on this. at every opportunity he has spoken out about not just the importance of voting but the fact that there is a concerted effort to lie to the american public about free and fair elections to undermine the ability to vote. and as the president pointed out the ability to have one's vote count. you know, it's one thing to be allowed to vote. it's another thing to be sure your vote will count. so i give kudos to the president for speaking out on this again,
representation is tyranny. the people would all like it have their vote count. it's a political thing. republicans say that's never going to happen. democrats say it is something we aspire to. so that's what really is at the core of this is joe biden who is for statehood is going to vote against home rule. >> ainsley: the reason they have to go to congress obviously is because d.c. is not a state. >> steve: it's a federal city. >> ainsley: exactly your daughter lives there i'm sure you worry about crime. >> steve: every day. >> ainsley: your child living there. go ahead. brian. >> brian: this thing is bigger than statehood. about democrats realizing we are going to get our butts kicked if why don't respond to the american people's concern about crime. warning sign the worst mayor you would think outside of mayor de blasio now that he is retired and sleeping in until noon and working out on his own, mayor lightfoot gets jumped -- doesn't even finish in the top 2 comes in third in the runoff.