wmds, a connection with al qaeda. all that disproven. i m surprised his people let him go on tv to talk this way. he s delusional. we re not booking him. somebody keeps booking him. he and wolfowitz and these guys get regular bookings. let s get to the fundamental question. it seems the republican party is doing something it never did in 2004. when you had any time ron paul dared to question he was practically booed off the stage. rudy giuliani would be like a vampire going at him. better late than never. republicans are having the debate they didn t care are have in the early parts of the last decade. dick cheney didn t answer the questions there. they were implicit in rand paul s critique. rand paul wasn t call names or shouting about world war ii or 9/11.
rand paul wasn t call names or shouting about world war ii or 9/11. he very practically said did we understand there would be a civil war there. are we saferñi than we were? did the war end in 2005? he was asking logical, straight ahead questionses that any sensible person in either party or no party would ask. dick cheney comes back with the name calling. comes back with you re an isolationist. just like hitler in the 30s. like 9/11. what dick cheney doesn t understand and a lot of republicans including rand paul understand is that kind of name calling an easy route to political superiority the bush/cheney administration used a decade ago won t work now and won t work even in republican primaries. let me try something. it wasn t just the idealogues, the freedom agenda people, the