We Should Follow the Constitution When Electing Our President
Commentary
The U.S. Constitution is the highest law in the land. It should be respected as we select our president.
The Constitution assigns state legislatures the role of directing the manner of appointing each state’s presidential electors, and stipulates that the president’s term expires at noon on Jan. 20 of the year following a presidential election. Most of the remaining details are filled in by federal law, which Congress rarely changes in a permanent way, but routinely tweaks in response to extenuating circumstances.
The date on which electoral votes are tallied by Congress, for instance, is regularly moved by a few days in either direction for various reasons. This doesn’t pose a problem, because the only deadline set by the Constitution comes two full weeks after the statutory date for counting the votes, which is Jan. 6.
Federalist Co-Founder Sean charged big tech and big media of
rigging the November election through their conspired suppression of blockbuster stories exposing incriminating information on their preferred presidential candidate, Joe Biden.
“There’s been a lot of talk about election rigging and vote counts and all that, but I think the election rigging that we haven’t given nearly enough attention to was the rigging done by corrupt media and big tech to suppress this story,” Davis said of the Hunter Biden
scandals plaguing the Biden administration, which “undoubtedly changed the election… That’s a huge scandal.”
Center (MRC) lends credence to Davis’s claim. According to an MRC-commissioned survey conducted in the days following the election, nearly 20 percent of Biden voters interviewed across eight key battleground states, seven of which the former vice president carried, reported they would have changed their decision at the ballot box had the media properly c
(Article by Raymond Wolfe republished from LifeSiteNews.com)
The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society documented over $500 million in grants from Zuckerberg to state and local officials through “a dark money apparatus of 10 nonprofits funded by 5 foundations, they said. Phill Kline, director of the Amistad Project, likened Zuckerberg’s efforts to a “shadow government running our elections,” at a press conference on Wednesday.
Most of the funds went to Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), a left-wing nonprofit “whose previous annual revenues never exceeded $1.2 million,” the Amistad Project noted.
“This network injected hundreds of millions of dollars into the election, violating state and federal election laws in the process and ensuring an unequal distribution of funding that favored Democratic precincts, depriving voters of both due process and equal protection,” Kline said.
A report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycleâ$350 million to the âSafe Electionsâ Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Researchâthat, âimproperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.â
âThe 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party. Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on wh
18 Dec 2020
A report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the “Safe Elections” Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research–that, “improperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.”
“The 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party. Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether th