Destroying things cheaply, risk-free has been a hallmark of U.S. military policy since the 1990s.
Here s What You Need To Remember: The Tomahawk is the backbone of the U.S. missile program. But that doesn t mean it s the only one in America s arsenal.
For the past three decades, America’s signature weapon of war has been the Tomahawk Land Attack Missile, or TLAM. The TLAM has helped bust down the doors of air-defense networks from Iraq to Libya, and has become a favorite tool of political influence for several presidents.
But what if the TLAM had never existed, or at least not in the form that we have grown accustomed to? What if the United States had given up the TLAM in arms control negotiations with the USSR?
Help Save People s World
The economic crisis has hit People s World hard. We need the support of all our friends and readers to continue publishing.
‘Ban the Bomb’ becomes international law, but U.S. doesn’t sign on December 22, 2020 1:11 PM CDT By Henry Lowendorf
An activist dressed up as President Trump rides an atomic bomb model during a protest for a world without nuclear weapons near the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, Germany, July 30, 2020. | Fabian Sommer / dpa via AP
Arguably the first step in half a century to eliminate nuclear weapons, the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) makes it internationally illegal to “develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess, or stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.”
When Vladimir Putin faced the world’s media recently for his annual end-of-year press conference, he was characteristically aggressive.
Asked by a BBC journalist whether, as Russia’s president for 20 years, he accepted any responsibility for the current “woeful state of relations” between his country and the west or whether the Russian authorities were “always white and fluffy” (a Russian expression for squeaky clean), he was scathing in his reply:
About us being “white and fluffy”. In comparison with you, yes we are … We heard you promise that Nato is not going to expand to the east – but you didn’t keep your word.
Is Trump really a Russia dove? Print this article
Russia’s purported hacking of U.S. government systems and President Trump’s unwillingness to prod Moscow for the breach have sparked one final downpour of indignation about, and flimsy analysis on, Trump’s Russia policy.
If you didn’t know any better, you would think Trump was the first-ever Russian intelligence asset to rise to the presidency. Jim Sciutto, CNN’s chief national security correspondent, tweeted recently that “the most consistent feature of Trump’s foreign policy is deference to Putin and Russia.”
Similarly, Richard Haass, the dignified head of the Council on Foreign Relations, slammed Trump’s Russia maneuverings as a four-year display of fecklessness to Vladimir Putin himself. Republican Sen. Mitt Romney, who never misses a chance to take a shot at Trump, went on NBC’s
Trump’s destructive policies and US global standing
Michael Jansen The author, a well-respected observer of Middle East affairs, has three books on the Arab-Israeli conflict. The author, a well-respected observer of Middle East affairs, has three books on the Arab-Israeli conflict.
20 Dec 2020 Surrounded by Army cadets, President Donald Trump watches the first half of the 121st Army-Navy Football Game in Michie Stadium at the United States Military Academy. File/Associated Press The incoming Biden administration will not only have to reverse a host of Donald Trump’s divisive and destructive domestic policies but also deal with damage he has inflicted on US global standing by using a wrecking ball to demolish key bilateral and multilateral agreements and global understandings.