Himachal court questions agriculture Director in fraud case
By IANS |
Published on
Tue, Apr 6 2021 17:36 IST |
2 Views
Himachal Pradesh High Court.. Image Source: IANS News
Shimla, April 6 : Taking exception to the order passed by the state agriculture Director regarding imposing a minor penalty upon the petitioner in a case of proven misconduct of misappropriation or embezzlement of Rs 26,69,447, the Himachal Pradesh High Court on Tuesday directed the former to explain his position.
A division bench of Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia passed the order on a writ petition challenging the imposition of penalty on June 4, 2019 upon him with direction to deposit Rs 26,69,447 along with interest.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court last week gave its go-ahead to the Mandi Shivaratri Fair, an annual renowned international fair that is held for 7 days, taking into account and expressing.
The Supreme Court has expressed its displeasure on the incomprehensible judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court and said such orders do disservice to the cause of ensuring accessible and understandable justice to citizens . The top court said judgments are intended to convey the reasoning and process of thought which leads to the final conclusion of the adjudicating forum. A bench of justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah, which was dealing with an appeal filed by the State Bank of India and others in a matter arising out of the disciplinary action against an employee, stayed the order of the high court and said no coercive action be taken against the bank and others as per the award of Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT).
<b>Allahabad High Court</b> <b>1. </b><b>Writ Of Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable Against Judicial Order Of Magistrate /CWC Sending Minor Victim To Children Protection Homes:Allahabad High Court (FB)</b><b> </b><i>[Rachna & Anr.</i>.
For plain English, not gobbledygook March 14, 2021, 11:26 PM IST
Quick takes, analyses and macro-level views on all contemporary economic, financial and political events.
The Supreme Court of India has referred a judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court back to the court on the ground that it is incomprehensible. In support of this description, Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah quoted three paragraphs from the high court judgment. A painstaking reading of the quoted text reveals letters of the normal English alphabet arranged to form English syllables, some Latin words favoured by judges, a profusion of commas and missing sense. We commend the Supreme Court bench for what amounts to its public admonition of the high court judge. Remedy is required not just in the matter dealt with by the petition on which the inscrutable order was passed but also on deficiencies in the selection of judges and the persistence of an archaic lingo in t