Page 11 - இராணுவம் தந்திரோபாய ஏவுகணை அமைப்பு News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Share Credit: U.S. Air Force The article “Will U.S. Army Missile Buys Mean Fewer U.S. Air Force Bombers?” ( AW&ST Feb. 22-March 7, p. 63) requires correction and a clear answer to the question itself. In an era when national security demands are increasing while resources allocated to defense are decreasing, leaders must prioritize solutions that optimize U.S. power-projection capabilities at best value. To those points, the choice between Air Force bombers and Army long-range missiles yields a very clear determination: Bombers win, hands down.  First, the statement that once new Army surface-to-surface missiles arrive, “the Army will no longer rely on the Air Force’s inventory of bombers and fighter-bombers to hunt and destroy targets deep inside enemy territory” is categorically incorrect. The number of aimpoints targeted during Operation Desert Storm was approximately 40,000. In a major regional conflict with China, Russia or one of their surrogates, that number cou

John murrayArmy atacmsArmy tactical missile system atacmsAir forceOperation desert stormArmy tactical missile systemLockheed martinDomain sensorIraqi scudFutures commandஜான் முர்ரேஅேக படைசெயல்பாடு பாலைவனம் புயல்இராணுவம் தந்திரோபாய ஏவுகணை அமைப்புலாக்ஹீட் மார்டின்களம் சென்சார்