Posted By Ruth King on December 15th, 2020
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication.” Allied Security Operations Group, Antrim Michigan Forensics Report, Revised Preliminary Summary, v2, December 13, 2020.
“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.” Allied Security Operations Group, Antrim Michigan Forensics Report, Revised Preliminary Summary, v2, December 13, 2020.
9 & 10 News
December 14, 2020
After a judge’s decision Monday morning, the results of an audit of ballot counting machines in Antrim County are now being made available to the public.
A lawsuit filed last month by Bill Bailey led to the forensic examination. The audit was done by the Allied Security Operations Group – a cybersecurity firm in Texas.
That group has been linked to some flawed testimony in support of lawsuits brought by the Trump campaign. In one case they mistakenly identified counties in Minnesota in their description of concerns in Michigan.
But this new report focuses solely on Antrim County, where the drama started on election night. The historically Republican county appeared to go blue for Joe Biden. The next morning it was reported the results were flipped in error and the winner was actually Donald Trump. The county clerk later said it was human error, and not machine, that led to the mix-up.
Toggle open close
Introduction
Vote harvesting is the collection of absentee ballots from voters by a third party who then delivers them to election officials. Allowing individuals other than the voter or his immediate family to handle absentee ballots is a recipe for mischief and wrongdoing in elections. Neither voters nor election officials have the means of verifying that the secrecy of the ballot has not been compromised or that ballots submitted by third parties such as candidates, campaign operatives, party activists, or political consultants have not been tampered with by the vote harvester. That is why Arizona wisely changed its law in 2016 to ban vote harvesting by certain third parties.
Forensic Audit of the Dominion Voting Equipment in Michigan Shows ‘Intentional Errors’
An expert view on the audit of the Dominion Voting Systems
Commentary
While you need an ID to buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, buy lottery tickets, enter a nightclub, get on an airplane, buy a house or rent an apartment, buy a car and get car insurance, we don’t require an ID to choose who will be our next president?
It turns out, thanks to our Operation Iraqi Freedom, that the elections in Iraq are more secure than ours. There, they use strong multifactor authentication–one real fingerprint, one real ID, and one real registered voter who shows up in person.
Paper Ballots Played a Key Role in Defending the Integrity of the 2020 Election
Workers prepare paper absentee ballots to be counted at the Richland County Administration Building on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020.
Tracy Glantz / The State / Tribune News Service via Getty Images
By
If Donald Trump ever does leave the White House, we can in large part thank paper ballots.
Trumpâs desperate assault on 2020âs popular vote has drawn justifiable contempt. But had this election predominantly been conducted on the computerized touchscreen machines that have dominated our electoral process since Florida in 2000, Trump could well be headed for a stolen second term.