Page 4 - எஃகு ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Thursday, February 4, 2021 The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tackled the question of whether non-signatories to an agreement may use state law doctrines to compel arbitration. Holding that the claims were insufficiently “intertwined” to permit equitable estoppel and had to be analyzed under federal law (and not state or foreign law), the Court affirmed denial of a non-signatory’s bid to arbitrate its claims for trademark infringement against one of the signatories to a contract governed by Indian law.  Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP, Case No. 18-35573 (9th Cir. Jan. 20, 2021) (Nelson, J.) (Bea, J., dissenting). The dispute arose from a business partnership between brothers. Balkrishna and Nagraj Setty formed in order to continue their late father’s Indian incense business. The brothers signed a partnership deed that included an arbitration provision stating:

New yorkUnited statesBalkrishna settyNagraj settyGe energy conversion franceShrinivas sugandhalayaUs courtOutokumpu stainless united statesSupreme courtGe energyPartnership deedYork conventionNinth circuitIndian arbitration actStainless united statesJudge bea