Page 14 - எங்களுக்கு காப்புரிமை முத்திரை அலுவலகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Wed, Jun 30th 2021 3:33pm Mike Masnick As you may recall, a few weeks ago I wrote about how Congress was asking the GAO to investigate whether the director of the US Patent & Trademark Office had been interfering in determinations made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). I m not going to go into all of the background again (please read the original for that), but under the America Invents Act, a process for reviewing patents after they were granted was set up, known as the Inter Partes Review (IPR) process. This was important, because the granting of patents is a non-adversarial process, where patent examiners are not given very much time to actually review everything. So the IPR process allowed those (especially those with prior art) to kick off a process by which the PTAB would recheck to see if the original examiner made a mistake in granting a 20 year monopoly to someone.

United statesMike masnickSupreme courtApjs senateUs patent trademark officeTechdirt teamPatent officeCan overrule theirTrademark officePatent trialAppeal boardAmerica invents actInter partes reviewAdministrative patent judgesAppointments clauseAlexander hamilton