SCOTUS upholds Arizona voting law restrictions westcentralsbest.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from westcentralsbest.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
View Comments
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed a federal moratorium on evictions imposed in response to the coronavirus pandemic to remain in place.
Without comment, the court declined to take up an emergency appeal from the Alabama Association of Realtors and other groups, who had argued the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded its authority by imposing the moratorium last fall.
That means a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit keeps the moratorium in place while the suit works its way through the courts.
Four of the court s conservatives, Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett said they would have blocked the moratorium.
U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “The Second Amendment protects modern weapons,” Judge Roger T. Benitez observed in his landmark
Miller v. Bonta ruling striking down California’s so-called “assault weapons” ban. He was citing
Caetano v. Massachusetts, a 2016 United States Supreme Court decision vacating a woman’s conviction for carrying a stun gun for self-defense.
“The Court has held that ‘the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,’” the High Court, citing the
Heller case, unanimously held. “In this case, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts upheld a Massachusetts law prohibiting the possession of stun guns after examining ‘whether a stun gun is the type of weapon contemplated by Congress in 1789 as being protected by the Second Amendment.’”
Published June 30, 2021, 9:26 AM
Supreme Court
“Fairness is what justice really is,” said the late former Justice Potter Stewart of the United States Supreme Court.
Justice Stewart’s famous quote aptly described how the Philippine Supreme Court (SC) resolved the dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commission on Audit (COA) involving the use of the former’s retained earnings for the provident fund of its officials and employees.
In 2010, SEC disbursed P19.72 million out of its retained earnings – derived from service fees and rebates – as its contribution to the provident fund wherein officials and employees would shell out three percent of their monthly salaries as their counterpart fund.
Supreme Court calls for review of case involving prone restraint 9news.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from 9news.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.